Active Users:718 Time:15/11/2024 12:36:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1576 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 416 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 925 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 408 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 845 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 413 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 712 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 408 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 459 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 511 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 483 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 459 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 465 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 412 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 458 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 831 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 441 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 724 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 405 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 419 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 821 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 426 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 747 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1013 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 391 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 397 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 411 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 402 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 397 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 728 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 457 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 671 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 408 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 410 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 404 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 399 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 375 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 748 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 722 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 718 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 822 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 776 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 434 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 797 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1257 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 764 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 899 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 838 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 765 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 732 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 894 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1133 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 725 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 913 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 649 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 718 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 624 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 818 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 959 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 763 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 847 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 620 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 729 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 378 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 691 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 685 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 813 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 915 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 738 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 965 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 778 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 707 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 436 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 386 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 395 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes