Active Users:404 Time:04/04/2025 12:41:15 PM
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1670 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1014 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 447 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 946 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 452 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 798 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 451 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 498 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 548 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 499 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 511 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 452 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 500 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 812 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 446 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 456 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 923 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 466 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 825 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1113 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 433 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 437 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 445 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 488 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 825 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 495 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 764 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 450 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 451 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 445 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 419 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 854 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 815 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 806 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 475 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 885 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1348 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 852 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1000 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 938 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 847 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 826 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 985 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1222 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 821 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1002 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 745 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 823 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 717 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 932 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1056 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 851 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 945 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 733 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 822 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 420 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 787 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 748 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 920 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1007 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 805 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1063 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 868 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 815 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 466 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 427 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 433 Views

Reply to Message