Active Users:379 Time:04/04/2025 11:30:20 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM
If it's going to be spoiler free AND a separate post I don't understand why anyone would vote no. Anyone who doesn't want to read it doesn't have to.


I've received contact from a few posters who say that they're getting copies of TGS before the 27th of October. The spoiler policy at this moment is to ban all such information from being posted on the board.

Would you like the board to remain closed to these reviews until October 27, or would you like me to create a special area for them for people to read, if they want to?

If no, then all these people can read their advanced copies but post nothing about it until October 27. The advantage of this is that the board is kept clean of both good and false reviews. There are people who will post lies which could potentially contaminate the board, and create rumours on other sites as to the validity of our content i.e. make us a laughing stock.

If yes, I'll create an announced post for spoiler-free reviews of the new book. If anyone has read or claims to read the book before October 27, they can post there. Again, SPOILERS will still NOT be allowed, but these posters can post their spoiler-free reviews in this area. I'll also not defend the validity of any review, so you can read it at your peril. Don't be angry if a poster writes about the huge occurence in the early book surrounding Perrin, which just doesn't happen, and leaves you disappointed. Some posters also want to write vague details regarding the books i.e. how many chapters, maps, PoV's there are.

Examples of what you might see on this board...

- My spoiler-free review of TGS by Dragon21
- My own spoiler-free review of TGS by Hamhead
- Maps you can find in the new book by Jumpingjack


Examples of what you will not see on this board...

- My review of TGS *spoilers* *spoilers* by Jeff
- The Forsaken who die in TGS by Illiterateboy
- How TGS ends by Peterpumpkineater

Let me know what you think... I'm going to do this by popular demand. If the result is NO, it will be NO or vice-versa.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1670 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 457 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1016 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 447 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 946 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 452 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 799 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 451 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 498 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 548 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 520 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 499 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 511 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 452 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 500 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 921 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 469 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 812 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 446 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 456 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 924 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 466 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 825 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1114 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 433 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 437 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 453 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 445 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 488 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 825 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 495 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 764 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 450 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 451 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 446 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 445 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 419 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 854 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 816 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 806 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 874 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 870 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 475 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 886 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1348 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 852 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1000 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 938 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 847 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 827 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 985 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1223 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 823 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1002 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 745 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 824 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 718 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 932 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1057 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 851 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 945 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 734 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 822 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 420 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 787 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 748 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 921 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1007 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 806 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1063 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 868 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 815 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 466 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 427 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 433 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes