Active Users:351 Time:04/04/2025 12:08:20 AM
Here's a scary thought redqueen Send a noteboard - 28/04/2011 11:54:50 PM

Egwene will be alive for at least the next three hundred years, barring accidents. If Aes Sedai age in the same way as non-channelers, she could expect to be fertile for perhaps the next hundred of those years. So if she were that way inclined she could have sixty to seventy babies. Just think of the fun she'd have getting them all married into important families and manipulating the world to bring them power! The family of al'Vere will rule the world! >:D
Reply to message
Egwene vs. Gawyn (ToM spoilers of course) - 28/04/2011 05:01:46 AM 4114 Views
There's fifty feet of crap between rock bottom and your post... *NM* - 28/04/2011 07:40:04 AM 503 Views
Almost three days since the last post...at least I'm trying. - 28/04/2011 12:17:59 PM 1014 Views
Sorry about that... - 28/04/2011 10:58:50 PM 1075 Views
Ah, its always good to see a good Egwene rant. Bravo! NM *NM* - 28/04/2011 01:58:46 PM 738 Views
Great work, Cannoli - 28/04/2011 02:09:28 PM 1030 Views
Regarding the mother's permission.... - 28/04/2011 07:26:29 PM 1093 Views
while i agree with you on most of this - 28/04/2011 04:53:06 PM 1159 Views
hmpf, i post a good point and nothing - 28/04/2011 11:09:53 PM 929 Views
Everybody agrees with you, that's why there were no replies *NM* - 28/04/2011 11:29:13 PM 488 Views
Here's a scary thought - 28/04/2011 11:54:50 PM 1245 Views
OMGWTFBBQ!? - 28/04/2011 11:58:37 PM 971 Views
In regards to the letters... - 28/04/2011 05:28:13 PM 1208 Views
But Gawyn was not Egwene's subject - 28/04/2011 06:09:31 PM 1007 Views
Which was why I thought it was appropriate, since he meant to act as Egwene's Warder. - 28/04/2011 06:19:53 PM 969 Views
The only issue is that Warders are not minions - they are honored junior partners. - 28/04/2011 07:39:18 PM 1132 Views
No, the junior partners are Accepted. Warders are essentially personal bodyguards and/or assistants. - 28/04/2011 08:00:17 PM 933 Views
Marriage - 28/04/2011 08:27:53 PM 948 Views
Accepted are not anything, let alone junior partners. Don't think N&E's experience was typical - 28/04/2011 09:32:22 PM 1177 Views
Here's the thing though... - 28/04/2011 11:20:32 PM 980 Views
No, but it's cute and quirky when Faile does it. - 29/04/2011 03:06:50 PM 1146 Views
But... - 29/04/2011 10:52:03 PM 941 Views
That's not really clear - 29/04/2011 11:41:20 PM 1074 Views
Actually, it is... - 30/04/2011 06:37:42 PM 1095 Views
Re: Actually, it is... - 30/04/2011 11:17:21 PM 972 Views
Didn't Siuan, Gareth and Gawyn tell her about the Bloodknife they encountered? - 02/05/2011 02:33:08 PM 978 Views
It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:10:23 PM 1281 Views
Re: It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:25:31 PM 1206 Views
thumbs up to you both *NM* - 28/04/2011 08:45:51 PM 477 Views
Re: It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:46:37 PM 1101 Views
Galad is a great option for a political marriage - 28/04/2011 09:04:46 PM 974 Views
Yes, but... - 28/04/2011 09:40:39 PM 1006 Views
but galad knew nothing of berelain's closeness to rand, so that couldn't have affected anything - 28/04/2011 10:12:23 PM 1049 Views
Exactly - 28/04/2011 10:27:04 PM 906 Views
Yes. An often overlooked point is that ELAYNE, not Egwene, gains the most power in ToM - 28/04/2011 09:42:43 PM 1359 Views
Except... - 28/04/2011 11:16:25 PM 1004 Views
Well... - 29/04/2011 12:14:42 AM 968 Views
Re: Well... - 29/04/2011 08:39:37 AM 927 Views
Except they're both really hot. - 28/04/2011 10:01:46 PM 1152 Views
They were naive - 28/04/2011 11:10:34 PM 948 Views
Re: They were naive - 29/04/2011 03:18:42 PM 1230 Views
I can only quibble; Egwene became so insufferable in ToM I'm convinced her fate will be unpleasant. - 04/05/2011 12:41:53 AM 1140 Views
Siuan... - 04/05/2011 05:42:59 AM 1115 Views
Re: Siuan screwed up big time. - 07/05/2011 03:35:46 AM 988 Views
Re: Siuan screwed up big time. - 12/05/2011 02:13:08 PM 968 Views
"McClellanesque", eh? I'll have to remember that one. - 16/05/2011 12:12:23 AM 1244 Views

Reply to Message