Active Users:348 Time:03/04/2025 11:26:18 PM
Re: Elaida urizen Send a noteboard - 09/04/2011 08:56:46 PM
It would depend on the time she was leader. If there were no major crises she would probably be okey. Elaida's problem is that she is very rigid in her world view. She has a fixed view of the world and can't adapt to events ever well. Nor can she work with others very well. Eliada gives orders and expects everyone to obey without question. That is not how the Tower workd and as powerful as the Amyrlin Seat is she still needs the working support of the Hall. Elaida is not very good at getting that sort of consensus support.

As long as things are boring there is no harm in that but at a time of major upheavel Elaida would be very severely tested.


I'd say it also depends on who's PoV you're looking from. From the PoV of the Tower during a period of "peace" she would probably be seen in a favorable light, while if you viewed her through the eyes of the "common" man then the verdict would not be favorable at all.
Reply to message
Elaida - 09/04/2011 02:40:45 PM 3246 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 03:16:09 PM 1355 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 08:56:46 PM 1041 Views
Re: Elaida - 10/04/2011 10:58:57 AM 940 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 07:38:47 PM 1040 Views
Even before she became a caricature, she didn't exactly look all that capable - 10/04/2011 08:24:48 PM 986 Views
Well, that depends. - 10/04/2011 10:16:07 PM 978 Views
Re: Elaida - 11/04/2011 03:36:46 PM 980 Views
Those traits prevent her from being a good leader. Maybe she'd become a good Sister in time. - 11/04/2011 06:11:06 PM 866 Views
Re: Elaida never had to compromise before.... - 13/04/2011 11:59:44 AM 944 Views
Perhaps. - 13/04/2011 04:23:45 PM 978 Views
Re: Perhaps. - 15/04/2011 10:38:30 AM 886 Views
Re: Perhaps. - 15/04/2011 07:51:24 PM 793 Views
Not really - 15/04/2011 10:22:12 PM 842 Views
Re: Not really - 16/04/2011 12:27:35 AM 843 Views
Re: Not really - 16/04/2011 10:00:44 AM 876 Views
Surprised - 17/04/2011 10:22:41 AM 898 Views
Re: Surprised - 17/04/2011 10:57:03 AM 1051 Views

Reply to Message