just asking...
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 12265 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 2090 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 2731 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 1311 Views
well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 2482 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 2018 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 2419 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 2173 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 2181 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 1973 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 2011 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 2062 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 2006 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 1855 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 1913 Views
My congratulations then . *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 1825 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 2057 Views
There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 2023 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 1281 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 1969 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 1923 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 1984 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 2015 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 1829 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 2084 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 1948 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1448 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 1873 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 1988 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 1842 Views
Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 2264 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 2278 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 1974 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1882 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 1839 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 1815 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 1934 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 1852 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 1901 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 1883 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 2030 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 1770 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 1765 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 1824 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 1935 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 1881 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 1836 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 2081 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him .
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 1811 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 1778 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 1833 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 1751 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 1892 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 1807 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 1969 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 1749 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 1960 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 1851 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 2064 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 10609 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 2081 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 1809 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 1950 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 1971 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 2018 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 1893 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 2041 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 2016 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 2096 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 2426 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 2259 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 2018 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 1838 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 1834 Views
Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 1831 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 1687 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 1825 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 2006 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 2026 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 1902 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 1961 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 1734 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 1812 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 1958 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 1826 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 1705 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 1923 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 1887 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 1892 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 2437 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 1869 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 1886 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 2185 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 1847 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 1748 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 1826 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 1930 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 1936 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 1661 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 1963 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 1962 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 3104 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 1695 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 1770 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 1723 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 1862 Views
About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 1833 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 1957 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 1832 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 1826 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 1741 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 1665 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 1847 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 1806 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 1949 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 1888 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 1700 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 1977 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 1965 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 1823 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 1987 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 1876 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 2149 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 1939 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 9359 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 1876 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 1957 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 1975 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 1980 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 1999 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 1955 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 2091 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 1138 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 1814 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 2018 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 2028 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 1175 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 1816 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 1838 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 1844 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 1772 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 1911 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 1099 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 1229 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 1752 Views
Could a thread be locked?
31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM
- 1774 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 1112 Views