For instance, gateway talent we saw in TGS.
How is someone so weak able to create gateways when others of greater strength cannot create the same gateways? what are the mechanics behind that talent?
How is that possible?
If it is a different weave then others should be able to learn it? If it is just requiring less power then that is stupid.
How is someone so weak able to create gateways when others of greater strength cannot create the same gateways? what are the mechanics behind that talent?
How is that possible?
If it is a different weave then others should be able to learn it? If it is just requiring less power then that is stupid.
It's not stupid, it's a fundamental principle of the OP: the more precise/deft you are, the less power you need to accomplish the same task, because your weave is more efficient. It's the same weave, it's just more precise.
There are many components to the Travelling weave: a part makes the hole or the folding, another relates to the starting location, another to end point. You can vary the precision of your end point.
In Androl's case there's likely more than just deftness involved. He might be more "in tune with the Pattern" and have a better inner sense of how to translate his location into his weave, and where he wants the gateway to open, and how big it is. He probably needs only a fraction of the time the average channeller does to "learn the ground". Most people's Gateways aren't fancy things: they are very power-intensive weaves, most likely to compensate for their lack of precision. They probably put a lot of OP in there that wouldn't be necessary if their weaves were more precise. You really need that small thread placed just so, but most channellers can't place it just so and use a bigger, more clumsy thread.
Androl's are fancy. He's far more efficient than the average gateway maker and needs just a fraction of the OP they have to put into their weaves. He's extremely precise, for example he can use tiny gateways as cutting tools.
Talents don't make much sense
07/03/2011 09:34:56 AM
- 1740 Views
Re: Talents don't make much sense
07/03/2011 03:51:17 PM
- 897 Views
I have a slightly different view on your last two points
07/03/2011 07:30:43 PM
- 710 Views
Re: I have a slightly different view on your last two points
08/03/2011 01:29:46 PM
- 686 Views
thanks for the quote ... truly appreciate it
08/03/2011 05:07:19 PM
- 662 Views
Re: thanks for the quote ... truly appreciate it
08/03/2011 08:59:18 PM
- 712 Views
I don't find it all that complicated of far fetched
09/03/2011 04:34:03 PM
- 577 Views
Re: I don't find it all that complicated of far fetched
10/03/2011 03:00:05 PM
- 693 Views
seems to me a non-sentient entity would be less likely to give abilities to a specific individual
10/03/2011 09:28:36 PM
- 578 Views
One thought on the Sea Folk example
08/03/2011 07:27:15 PM
- 584 Views
also very possible ... I'm just thinking "outloud" so to speak
09/03/2011 04:32:08 PM
- 573 Views
No worries - 'thinking out loud' and going on tangents are my favorite hobbies here
09/03/2011 05:54:42 PM
- 544 Views
I don't think they are supposed to make 'sense', really. Maria gave info about Talents in a Q&A
07/03/2011 04:05:40 PM
- 826 Views
Gateway Talent?
07/03/2011 08:19:12 PM
- 599 Views
Re: Gateway Talent?
08/03/2011 02:12:53 PM
- 626 Views
Re: Gateway Talent?
08/03/2011 11:15:55 PM
- 668 Views
It doesn't break the rule so much as shows that the rules aren't as universal as we thought
09/03/2011 04:15:20 PM
- 592 Views