If you cannot say what is "good" about a passage you cited as an example of good prose, then surely you have no right to the tone you've used in most of this thread. FT is very clearly not saying he finds Jordan great or good or anything. His question is only about a passage you cited, and so far, all you have done is dismiss him.
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM
- 3190 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer.
21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM
- 1581 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured
22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM
- 1222 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM
- 1086 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM
- 1183 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM
- 1550 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM*
22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM
- 864 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM
- 1024 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
- 1139 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
- 1590 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
- 1244 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler.
22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM
- 1150 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a
23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM
- 1196 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ...
22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM
- 1127 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM
- 1997 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited.
22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM
- 1498 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM
- 1255 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM
- 1223 Views
adam roberts reviews
23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
- 1223 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM*
23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM
- 717 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking
24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM
- 1071 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM
- 1364 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM
- 1318 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM*
22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
- 676 Views
There are nine, actually...
23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM
- 1365 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM
- 739 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM
- 721 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you.
23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM
- 1066 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you.
24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM
- 1213 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM
- 1151 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM
- 992 Views
So wait, style is good?
25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM
- 1402 Views
That depends...
23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM
- 1288 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria.
23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM
- 1160 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion
23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM
- 1154 Views
If you don't mind me asking...
24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM
- 976 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM
- 973 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM
- 1137 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM
- 1189 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM
- 1099 Views
...
25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM
- 1048 Views
It is not a serious question.
25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM
- 1035 Views
How so?
25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM
- 1177 Views
Is that so?
25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM
- 1110 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan.
25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM
- 1131 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
- 1171 Views
You're conflating two things.
25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM
- 1146 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere.
26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM
- 1067 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity.
26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM
- 901 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM*
26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM
- 688 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered.
25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
- 1058 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM
- 1218 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
- 1628 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you.
25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM
- 984 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
- 992 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM
- 1035 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly
23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM
- 1199 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM
- 1032 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM
- 1207 Views
Of course people read for pleasure.
23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM
- 997 Views
Ok...
24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM
- 1033 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument.
24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM
- 1107 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"?
24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM
- 1122 Views
Among living writers?
24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM
- 1158 Views
My list would be similar...
26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM
- 1260 Views
That was a very good list.
26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM
- 1093 Views
Re: That was a very good list.
27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM
- 1149 Views
Oh, and another question
27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM
- 943 Views
Re: Oh, and another question
01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM
- 1096 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM
- 1201 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM
- 1228 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM
- 1135 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
- 1083 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM*
27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM
- 761 Views