Active Users:1127 Time:23/11/2024 04:56:15 AM
You're misapplying practices. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 07/02/2011 01:08:22 PM
I'm not sure I agree here. The few Forsaken we've seen dealing with minions have been pretty good about hiding their true identity. I really don't see them telling even their most trusted Darkfriends their NAME, just the fact that they are Chosen.
You mean Bel'al, whose pet Black sisters referred to him as "Great Master Bel'al" when they captured Nynaeve & Elayne? And even if we stipulate this rather absurd point, those are all the later, secretive ones. Rahvin, Sammael & Bel'al turn up first because they're the kind who go for public rule, and leading nations, even if they use a different name. Regardless of what Semirahge and Mesaana might do several books later, we plainly see Rahvin give orders to Comar without the slightest disguise (unless his appearance throughout his run in the series is a disguise - but that's the only way he ever appears, and in his PoV he says nothing about being in disguise), and Lord Elgar (later seen among Rand's court in Caemlyn) attends him with no efforts at concealment either. The important things, at that point in the series, the Forsaken were not pulling these sorts of tricks, and Rahvin, Sammael and Bel'al were all shown to be operating in a similar fashion - they take control of a nation by inveigling themselves into the political structure. They openly and publicly weild power. By contrast, the two we see concealing their identity (both of whom are known to their minions by their names) do not hold actual power in their cover identities. Danelle holds no position of authority in the Tower, and was even eased out of Elaida's inner circle of coup-plotters. Anath might have had license to back-talk and strike Tuon, but she too had no real authority of her own or borrowed from a boss, as the sul'dam points out when she is captured. By contrast, even if their true identities were unknown, Gaebrial, Samon and Brend were generally known as important men and leaders of their nations, if not the de facto rulers. While this proves nothing about Sammael's or Bel'al's habits that might expose their identities, it still goes to show that they have more in common with the man who was accidentally overheard by a guy with no powers who wasn't even trying, than the secretive behavior you ascribe as typical of the Forsaken.

And even if Moiraine just HAPPENED to have Darkfriend informants in both Tear and Illian that she can get in contact with in just a few hours, nobody knows anything about Be'lal, so she would have no clue as to which Forsaken he was. It is only after she announces it is he that Loial informs her about his nickname "Netweaver".
Yeah, of all that Loial tells her, that nickname is one of maybe two facts she did not know, and she even says that the nickname fits with other stuff. She was plainly NOT totally ignorant of him before that scene. And given the parallels with those two and with Rhavin, it should be obvious how a woman whose very first learned ability with the One Power was eavesdropping could have tumbled onto their secret identities. 8}
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Question about Rand and Lanfear's battle before Moiraine's game-saving tackle, and other ?s - 04/02/2011 01:05:56 AM 1654 Views
I thought of another... - 04/02/2011 01:10:23 AM 886 Views
Re: Question about Rand and Lanfear's battle before Moiraine's game-saving tackle, and other ?s - 04/02/2011 01:52:55 AM 1011 Views
Re: Question about Rand and Lanfear's battle before Moiraine's game-saving tackle, and other ?s - 06/02/2011 08:15:43 PM 818 Views
You're misapplying practices. - 07/02/2011 01:08:22 PM 774 Views
Still disagree... - 08/02/2011 06:11:38 AM 705 Views
Re: Still disagree... - 08/02/2011 11:58:19 AM 711 Views
Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor? - 09/02/2011 05:45:13 AM 788 Views
Have YOU? - 15/02/2011 12:47:39 AM 964 Views
She doesn't have to overhear them to know that something is fishy - 21/02/2011 10:35:41 AM 683 Views
There are ways of detecting a man's weaves. - 04/02/2011 04:49:55 AM 749 Views
Some ideas - 04/02/2011 08:26:09 AM 702 Views
No, I think RJ just didn't think it through, seeing as Rand sliced Lanfear's invisible weaves too... - 04/02/2011 11:42:38 AM 732 Views
Re: It might not be that hard - 04/02/2011 12:20:02 PM 784 Views
it's different - 04/02/2011 02:21:44 PM 733 Views
So what stopped Lanfear from flicking him against the skull with a surprise club of Air... - 04/02/2011 02:33:53 PM 788 Views
nothing - 04/02/2011 02:45:52 PM 758 Views
Gestures and Weaves go hand in hand and since flows originate from the body you can logically - 05/02/2011 05:45:00 PM 750 Views
In general, only third age Aes Sedai gesture when they weave - it's a block imposed by training. - 07/02/2011 06:20:33 PM 791 Views
Not true - 08/02/2011 01:54:17 PM 594 Views
Your example proved my point - LTT only said that it was needed for certain weaves. - 08/02/2011 04:20:28 PM 1522 Views
Hmm... - 08/02/2011 05:38:13 PM 685 Views
It's a flawed and incorrect given all the examples we've seen in the books. - 08/02/2011 08:36:32 PM 580 Views
Verin could not see the weaves - 08/02/2011 10:16:56 PM 679 Views
Also... - 08/02/2011 11:35:20 PM 586 Views
Well, that's partially the point I'm bringing up. - 09/02/2011 03:19:07 PM 627 Views
I never said she could - I said she sensed them, and felt the woman's channeling. - 09/02/2011 03:04:00 PM 620 Views
I think this is the crux of the matter - 09/02/2011 03:32:18 PM 696 Views

Reply to Message