Active Users:937 Time:23/12/2024 07:16:45 PM
*shrug* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 02/02/2011 08:07:35 PM
If it doesn't transmit shockwaves, then you have what, a completely rigid material? That means you can't move it, for one, since it will require an infinite amount of energy to move. And if it doesn't require an infinite amount of energy to move, because it's powered by plotholium, then it violates relativity and you have a faster-than-light material.

Since you can move heartstone, I choose to believe it simply has a mechanism by which it absorbs energy and uses it to reinforce its structure. No violation of general relativity required.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Cuendillar Armor - 26/01/2011 06:26:03 PM 1474 Views
We had a lengthy discussion of this on wotmania a few years ago... - 26/01/2011 06:46:27 PM 980 Views
There are problems. - 26/01/2011 07:14:29 PM 867 Views
Properties not understood... - 26/01/2011 08:15:48 PM 956 Views
So, a thin layer of cuendillar, with lot of padding? *NM* - 26/01/2011 09:52:18 PM 302 Views
Re: There are problems. - 28/01/2011 06:31:19 PM 854 Views
The spike was a later addition; the primary method of damage was blunt force trauma. *NM* - 28/01/2011 09:20:32 PM 300 Views
Plate armor is also a "late addition" - 03/02/2011 03:22:55 PM 608 Views
Who says it would transmit the shockwaves? As you note below it violates many laws of physics. *NM* - 02/02/2011 06:51:18 PM 320 Views
*shrug* - 02/02/2011 08:07:35 PM 690 Views
There is no shockwave - 03/02/2011 03:29:21 PM 666 Views
Chain mail not difficult but long process. - 26/01/2011 08:21:04 PM 1118 Views
it's "sole" purpose *NM* - 26/01/2011 11:21:19 PM 335 Views
a cookie for you! cheers *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:38:46 PM 290 Views
well there seems to be more effective ways of going about making armor - 28/01/2011 06:54:37 PM 682 Views
Reply in the wrong place. - 02/02/2011 06:52:26 PM 714 Views
Awesome. So take your thoughts and apply them to the situation. - 02/02/2011 08:10:05 PM 665 Views
I know, but it's more fun to break physics with magic *NM* - 02/02/2011 09:27:36 PM 316 Views
Re: I know, but it's more fun to break physics with magic - 04/02/2011 02:16:42 PM 658 Views

Reply to Message