Active Users:409 Time:04/04/2025 08:25:04 AM
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM
I walk 1km to get to the local shops. I've been to a university bigger than that! 10km is an upper bound, but this is still only 4% of London's area. Quite big, but the people in Caemlyn don't know the other side of the city, so it can't be too small...

Either way, it's an unreasonable amount of effort.


Mat knew his starting place, he was after all luring the thing out. Which narrows the number of possible spots even further. So what there are maybe 20 spots to choose from? Mat knew he needed to get the creature to one of the pre-determined locations. Seems simple enough to me, is Mat had been surprised bt the Golam again I would agree with you, but they had obviously planned out as close to the specific location as possible.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2123 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1336 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1157 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1136 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 495 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 496 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1037 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 852 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1064 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 462 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1002 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 968 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 945 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1025 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 926 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 992 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 821 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 866 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 799 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 839 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 466 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 871 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 901 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 913 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 887 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 901 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 825 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1043 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 885 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 907 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 918 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 833 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 895 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1016 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 951 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 856 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 515 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1051 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 819 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 829 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 439 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 996 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 920 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 903 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 836 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 916 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 940 Views

Reply to Message