Active Users:1104 Time:22/11/2024 02:19:26 PM
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common uglycat Send a noteboard - 25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM
if i had any complaints about BS, it would be his lack of subtlety and his sometimes over-verbosity.

for example, in ToM, 'Boots':
Elayne is going to Cairhien and Birgitte is worried about archers taking her out, so she turns to Alise, a Kinswoman and says:
"Can you do something to prevent archers from hitting her?" Birgitte asked Alise. "Some kind of weave?"

it's a very minor thing, but it's all over: what else would Birgitte be talking about when addressing a channeler? obviously she's talking about 'some kind of weave.', she's not asking Alise to catch the arrow with her hands.
it's just needless dialog.

he does this on a larger scale as well. i don't have an actual quote, but he'll write, say a paragraph, concerning a subject. as a reader you are able to figure out what he's talking about. which is fine. but then he'll repeat everything he just said but in a completely blunt manner. it feels almost like he's teaching a class, explaining a topic and then reinforcing the idea again. it feels like he's worried the reader won't pick up on what he's saying, so he reiterates everything dumbed down for the 'slower students in the class.'
this kind of thing really breaks up the pace and feels like padding.
Reply to message
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM 1796 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson - 23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM 1219 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM* - 24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM 379 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM* - 24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM 374 Views
Disagree... - 25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM 799 Views
yep *NM* - 25/01/2011 10:44:04 AM 337 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM 690 Views
Huh? - 23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM 909 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM 936 Views
Re: No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 09:34:03 AM 1003 Views
Is that really the case? A lot was cut from ToM? *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:16:05 PM 314 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM* - 24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM 373 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM 354 Views
No, because it is not a participle. - 24/01/2011 11:36:12 PM 810 Views
Sure it is - 25/01/2011 11:31:29 AM 829 Views
No. I have written: I sweated a lot when I was in India. *NM* - 25/01/2011 12:16:39 AM 368 Views
Um, yes,. sweated is the past tense of to sweat. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:37:58 AM 394 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM 814 Views
Meh. I see no problem with this example. - 26/01/2011 07:10:53 AM 765 Views
If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM 461 Views
I was kind of thinking this myself - 13/02/2011 10:50:07 AM 743 Views

Reply to Message