Active Users:657 Time:21/09/2024 03:56:18 AM
No, because it is not a participle. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 24/01/2011 11:36:12 PM
However, I would have no objection to writing "I sweated."
Reply to message
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM 1772 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson - 23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM 1193 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM* - 24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM 369 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM* - 24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM 365 Views
Disagree... - 25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM 775 Views
yep *NM* - 25/01/2011 10:44:04 AM 325 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM 668 Views
Huh? - 23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM 882 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM 913 Views
Re: No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 09:34:03 AM 984 Views
Is that really the case? A lot was cut from ToM? *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:16:05 PM 305 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM* - 24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM 363 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM 342 Views
No, because it is not a participle. - 24/01/2011 11:36:12 PM 783 Views
Sure it is - 25/01/2011 11:31:29 AM 804 Views
No. I have written: I sweated a lot when I was in India. *NM* - 25/01/2011 12:16:39 AM 355 Views
Um, yes,. sweated is the past tense of to sweat. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:37:58 AM 384 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM 786 Views
Meh. I see no problem with this example. - 26/01/2011 07:10:53 AM 732 Views
If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM 450 Views
I was kind of thinking this myself - 13/02/2011 10:50:07 AM 722 Views

Reply to Message