Active Users:1150 Time:22/11/2024 02:30:30 PM
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM
Or silly. Many others have chimed in before to say that they were disappointed with this or that appearance of "new language" from the new writer. "Investigation," "homicide..." there are many.

But really, I'm astounded by how bald his writing is. One thing I get annoyed by is when people use "like" instead of "is." "It's like I've been betrayed" is a dumb thing to say if your spouse cheats on you. You've been betrayed. There's no "like" there.

Sanderson, my first real taste of his writing, comes off as someone who drops comparisons every single time, even when a simile or metaphor might actually be the way to go. We don't understand that someone feels like an insect that's just broken through its shell to discover that it and its place in the world is new. Sanderson just writes "He looked around him and he discovered that he was different and his place in the world also was."

By the light, this writing gets ham-fisted right quick. It's little moments, like an Ashaman saying to Ituralde "My lord! I sense channeling!" Wow. That's an amazing bit of dialog. And so natural coming from a battle-trained channeler.

Then you get someone else describing Rand as a storm, adding "a storm of light and streams of power." Really? Aren't the streams actual streams of the One Power? Is Rand a stream of lower-case "power" or upper-case "Power?" Why was this line not edited out?

It feels weird to complain about Mat feeling slightly off. Everything is at least a little off - it's like finding someone tilted all your furniture 10 degrees to the right. It just gets shocking to suddenly read passages that are clearly written by RJ. Or to find the occasional moment where BS' brevity and directness actually work pretty well. It's not like RJ didn't ever do it; I just want to give the new guy some credit...

I can see all the critiques that DoMA (and others) made. The division of the novel, and its jumping around the timeline, is a bit messy. It also did break up the emotional impact of Rand's collapse, and being timed with the "darkest hour" for so many characters (like Perrin and Aviendha).

I'm just still amazed that I read a Wheel of Time novel that contained the non-word "sweated." Thanks, BS
This message last edited by newyorkersedai on 23/01/2011 at 08:04:51 PM
Reply to message
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM 1797 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson - 23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM 1219 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM* - 24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM 379 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM* - 24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM 374 Views
Disagree... - 25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM 799 Views
yep *NM* - 25/01/2011 10:44:04 AM 337 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM 690 Views
Huh? - 23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM 910 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM 936 Views
Re: No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 09:34:03 AM 1003 Views
Is that really the case? A lot was cut from ToM? *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:16:05 PM 314 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM* - 24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM 373 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM 354 Views
No, because it is not a participle. - 24/01/2011 11:36:12 PM 810 Views
Sure it is - 25/01/2011 11:31:29 AM 829 Views
No. I have written: I sweated a lot when I was in India. *NM* - 25/01/2011 12:16:39 AM 368 Views
Um, yes,. sweated is the past tense of to sweat. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:37:58 AM 394 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM 814 Views
Meh. I see no problem with this example. - 26/01/2011 07:10:53 AM 765 Views
If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM 461 Views
I was kind of thinking this myself - 13/02/2011 10:50:07 AM 743 Views

Reply to Message