Active Users:1107 Time:22/11/2024 01:19:10 PM
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ Send a noteboard - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.


Caemlyn is a big city. They would need to organise a lot of pre-determined locations to have any sort of coverage, which would be determined by how far Talmanes was prepared to lead the gholam. I would guess the he wouldn't try for more than 100 metres/yards. How many places would they need to give that sort of coverage across the city? If it is 1km across, then 100 locations. 10km, then 10,000 locations. Too many.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2024 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1239 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1076 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1049 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 455 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 459 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 939 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 774 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 981 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 436 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 880 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 886 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 857 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 923 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 835 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 904 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 732 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 817 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 813 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 810 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 801 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 740 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 947 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 799 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 823 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 836 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 738 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 804 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 917 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 867 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 754 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 463 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 955 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 736 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 738 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 402 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 913 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 835 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 806 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 741 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 834 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 851 Views

Reply to Message