Active Users:1169 Time:22/11/2024 02:45:38 PM
Skimming Onarishma Send a noteboard - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM
I do not recall seeing any restriction of that kind on Skimming. You do not have to be 'very familiar' with the place you are going to - you just have to know where you want to go.


Yeah, didn't Rand skim to Illian, where he had never been before? I can't recall what method he used, and I don't have the books handy.

Also, the Kin could have skimmed either way. i.e. they could have opened the gate in the house to a place they knew, or they could have skimmed from a place they knew to the house.


Rand travelled to Illian with a regular gateway.

Neither Skimming or Traveling require you to know where you are going well.

Traveling requires you to know where you are leaving from so that you have a starting point to match the one side of the pattern to the other(whether to bore a hole or make similar)

Skimming doesn't require much of anything because you are stepping into the void(T'A'R most likely) and you don't have to decide where you are going until you are there.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2026 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1239 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1078 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1050 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 455 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 459 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 941 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 776 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 982 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 436 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 882 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 888 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 859 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 925 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 837 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 906 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 733 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 819 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 815 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 812 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 803 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 742 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 949 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 800 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 825 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 838 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 740 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 806 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 919 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 869 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 756 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 463 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 957 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 738 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 740 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 402 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 915 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 835 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 807 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 743 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 836 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 853 Views

Reply to Message