Active Users:428 Time:04/04/2025 08:38:21 AM
get over it Japhy Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.


Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2123 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1336 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1157 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1136 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 495 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 496 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1038 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 853 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1065 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 462 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1002 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 968 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 945 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1025 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 926 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 993 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 821 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 902 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 913 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 888 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 901 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 826 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1043 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 885 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 907 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 919 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 834 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 896 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1016 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 951 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 857 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 515 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1051 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 819 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 830 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 439 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 997 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 920 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 905 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 836 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 917 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 940 Views

Reply to Message