Active Users:1195 Time:22/11/2024 01:42:55 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Wrong Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM
Gholam are not shadowspawn. They do not breed. They were constructs and as such are not affected by 'deathgates'.


The Gholam is definitely Shadowspawn. Additionally, all Shadowspawn are constructs. All constructs - except the Gholam, which apparently is a "higher level" of Shadowspawn - are affected by deathgates.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2025 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1239 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1077 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1050 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 455 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 459 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 940 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 775 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 981 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 436 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 880 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 887 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 859 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 924 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 836 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 904 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 732 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 772 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 716 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 752 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 436 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 794 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 817 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 813 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 810 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 803 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 742 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 949 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 800 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 825 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 837 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 738 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 804 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 918 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 874 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 867 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 755 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 463 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 955 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 738 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 739 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 402 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 915 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 835 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 806 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 741 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 834 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 851 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes