Active Users:1146 Time:23/11/2024 05:13:16 AM
Re: Nope. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).


He WAS there. So the viewing came true.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1793 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 434 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 892 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 739 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 593 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 618 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 565 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 798 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 714 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 920 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 315 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 799 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 630 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 640 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 613 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 657 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 714 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 627 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 653 Views

Reply to Message