Active Users:757 Time:01/11/2024 01:52:26 AM
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM
yeah, isn't that how the "deathgates" work? Shadow spawn can't survive being touched by the O.P. So when they pass through a gateway it kills them. Tollocs check in but they don't check out.


well, IIRC the deathgates mostly work on the principle that the gateway edges are extremely sharp, and that's the reason they open and close and they have not a round shape: that way, no one would survive a deathgate. The fact that shadowspawn can't pass through them is just a "plus".
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2019 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1232 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1069 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1044 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 453 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 455 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 934 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 768 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 976 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 430 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 872 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 881 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 851 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 915 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 828 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 891 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 720 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 810 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 807 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 805 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 794 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 731 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 941 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 792 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 815 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 829 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 728 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 796 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 911 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 862 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 746 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 461 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 949 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 730 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 726 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 396 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 906 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 827 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 800 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 728 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 828 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 842 Views

Reply to Message