Active Users:1144 Time:23/11/2024 04:21:27 AM
The viewing says "women who can channel" Ava Send a noteboard - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM
"Women" plural. Egwene alone wouldn't fulfill the viewing, nor would Semirhage alone. You could say that Semi + Elza makes it plural, or Egwene + some AS lackeys, but the viewing makes it sound like it will be a group of equal women, with none influential enough to stand out as the leader. (Just like Rand's kidnapping at Dumai's Wells, where the AS were essentially equal).

It seems more likely to me that Rand will be jeopardized by some of the many groups of Black AS that are running loose.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1792 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 434 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 890 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 739 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 592 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 618 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 564 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 796 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 713 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 919 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 315 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 798 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 630 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 640 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 612 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 656 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 714 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 627 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 651 Views

Reply to Message