Active Users:319 Time:29/09/2024 04:56:54 AM
Er no Ben Send a noteboard - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM
1. New Super Rand can't be harmed by the tower anymore. The pattern wont allow him to be captured or injured by them.
2. Assuming Eggy could overpower him and tries to beat him to show him who's boss then Aliva, Nyn, Caddy and whichever Ashaman Rand has with him will kick off. Probably with Perrins channelers forming circles too. This would lead to the destruction of nearly the whole of the light side as they battle each other. Not even Egwene is stupid enough to try and use force here.
3. Rand will most likely break the seals either before the talks start or right as they start. So that he can say, "right now that's done we can discuss what I wanted you all here to discuss". Basically his price of peace for him fighting the DO at SG.
4. I think those viewings have all been done now. The only other female who can channel who could harm Rand would be Cyndane. And there is still a fair chance of that.

Ben

PS Eggy's attitude needs sorting out mind. Wouldn't it be fun if one of the conditions of The Dragon's Peace is for Eggy (and by extension the tower) to kneel to the world's rulers to show the AS are the Servant of All and not the supreme power in the world.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1769 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 424 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 872 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 719 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 572 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 597 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 543 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 779 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 691 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 904 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 304 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 773 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 606 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 617 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 593 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 637 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 693 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 609 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 633 Views

Reply to Message