Active Users:872 Time:23/12/2024 10:50:41 AM
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. dacole Send a noteboard - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM
Severe errors on the part of the author regarding timelining, together with some almost criminally sloppy proof reading detract from a book that does move the plot along.

It will do what it says on the cover, and bring the dedicated reader closer to a resolution in what has become a truly epic saga. However the flaws mentioned above grate and the sloppy editing and obvious set piece scenes give a decidedly fan fiction feel to the book.

If I were to dwell on the flaws, this book could go as low as 3/10 but just for moving the story along and providing the beginnings of a resolution to 20 years of a tale, it creeps up to a 5/10 for me.


Yes I really didn't like the jumping around in time. Sorry but if I have to think to figure out where things fit in time in a book with this many characters and this much plot that is a problem. Not all of us are like larry and can keep this many characters in our head. This is a saturday morning action show not classic literature.
Reply to message
Post your review of Towers of Midnight - 07/11/2010 04:20:11 PM 10810 Views
Received Book On Friday... At Chapter 23... - 07/11/2010 08:29:29 PM 1266 Views
Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 10:34:23 PM 1442 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 11:02:39 PM 1470 Views
Makes a lot of sense really *NM* - 08/11/2010 12:55:47 AM 584 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 10/11/2010 04:30:06 AM 1025 Views
Fair assessment. - 16/11/2010 06:39:56 AM 1105 Views
5/10 *spoliers* - 08/11/2010 07:54:10 PM 1440 Views
About not sensing gholam. Nobody sensed him. It's the ability of the thing, I think *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:03:45 PM 585 Views
If so, then I forgot. I'd like a reference to that, though. *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:06:05 PM 620 Views
It does make logical sense... - 08/11/2010 10:49:51 PM 1117 Views
You wanted MORE of Elayne's political maneuvering ? - 08/11/2010 11:18:42 PM 1274 Views
Yes. I personally would've liked all that to be more detailed. - 09/11/2010 06:11:44 PM 1111 Views
That should have been more detailed... - 05/12/2010 02:46:07 AM 1061 Views
Some parts, yes. *NM* - 05/12/2010 04:18:21 PM 619 Views
6.9 out of 10, Does the Job with Some Nice Moments - 10/11/2010 04:26:08 AM 1313 Views
<Whoops, posted in the wrong place> *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:22 AM 491 Views
5 out of 10. it's ok, but... - 15/11/2010 05:59:00 PM 1269 Views
Seriously? - 05/12/2010 02:50:15 AM 1317 Views
7 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM 1166 Views
9 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 08:27:00 PM 1186 Views
4/5 Expected a bit more about the BT - 17/11/2010 04:17:25 AM 1253 Views
Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 20/11/2010 11:43:39 PM 1211 Views
And this is why being a critic sucks... - 26/11/2010 07:33:45 AM 1002 Views
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM 1579 Views
8.5/10, enjoyed it alot. *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:30:32 AM 708 Views
I'm an idiot - 04/12/2010 06:18:46 PM 1381 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 05/12/2010 01:53:23 PM 990 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 19/12/2010 05:48:30 AM 1101 Views
After a very long break from WoT... I'm back into it and loving it! - 05/12/2010 03:08:57 AM 1190 Views
Verdict: it was OK, 6.5/10, maybe 7, I need to reread it - 03/01/2011 02:41:34 AM 1364 Views
8 out of 10 - 09/01/2011 05:19:37 PM 1213 Views
Solid but not great continuation of the series, both exciting and flawed - 05/04/2011 08:34:48 AM 1188 Views

Reply to Message