Active Users:1210 Time:22/11/2024 07:39:30 PM
Re: A TV series is the only way to make it work Iceman Send a noteboard - 10/12/2010 04:56:17 PM
I don't think any fan would be happy with that though. Considering the ending is hopefully going to be "great" it would feel somewhat wrong to end it with book 3's ending. Unless of course the actually ending can be retrofitted somehow.

For me anything less than 5 movies will just be a disservice to the whole WOT universe. I think the books could have be completed in 8 books, and on screen chapters of braid tugging can be covered in a few seconds, 5-7 is possible on screen.

Having said all that putting it on the big screen might ruin it anyway. Although I'd defo go and see them all regardless. Then come here and complain afterwards
Reply to message
If WOT were to be made into a movie series, how many would you like to see? - 10/12/2010 11:22:51 AM 1598 Views
It won't. *NM* - 10/12/2010 02:30:21 PM 329 Views
This is an exercise in futility. WoT will not be made into a movie, so why waste energy on ... - 10/12/2010 03:04:26 PM 755 Views
I agree *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:13:30 PM 289 Views
A TV series is the only way to make it work - 10/12/2010 04:41:17 PM 851 Views
Re: A TV series is the only way to make it work - 10/12/2010 04:56:17 PM 898 Views
A Tetralogy for theatrical; a mini-series with CGI as an ideal release - 10/12/2010 05:19:22 PM 746 Views
I can confirm that Warner has the rights on an already adapted screenplay! - 10/12/2010 07:59:07 PM 1743 Views
A Trilogy - 10/12/2010 09:47:48 PM 570 Views
Personally? Zero. *NM* - 11/12/2010 12:33:23 AM 528 Views
Depends on who makes it. - 11/12/2010 04:37:32 AM 960 Views
Merchandising tie-ins - 12/12/2010 05:44:38 PM 790 Views
a book in the shape of an actual person sounds kinda disturbing, actually *NM* - 13/12/2010 12:19:24 AM 261 Views
True, but what a conversation starter, eh? *NM* - 13/12/2010 01:08:42 AM 857 Views
TRue. I've done slightly weirder for much the same effect =) *NM* - 14/12/2010 04:20:41 AM 539 Views
None... - 13/12/2010 12:12:20 PM 831 Views

Reply to Message