Active Users:592 Time:15/11/2024 03:55:08 PM
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM
Egwene wants to reform the WT and forge these alliances. I started out as an AS fan, but towards the end, I really wanted the Wondergirls to start something new.


At the very least with on ongoing threat from the Seanchan I can see the AS, Asha'man, WO and WF allying just to stay free of the leash!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:12:00 PM 1767 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:22:49 PM 982 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 10:44:01 PM 750 Views
*shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 03:26:21 PM 764 Views
I wonder what would have happened if she refused and left the tower entirely. - 07/12/2010 03:30:58 PM 749 Views
I doubt they would have stopped her ... but there was no real reason for her to refuse the - 07/12/2010 03:34:20 PM 713 Views
no there wasn't a real reason for her to refuse. It'd still be interesting if she did *NM* - 07/12/2010 03:37:45 PM 361 Views
would have made for an interesting spin on the plot - 07/12/2010 05:37:31 PM 695 Views
How is she not a lead? - 07/12/2010 06:25:45 PM 666 Views
She has never really had her own unique plot line - 07/12/2010 06:34:40 PM 646 Views
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that - 07/12/2010 07:46:08 PM 708 Views
Nothing to really argue here except perspective ... to each their own *NM* - 07/12/2010 10:26:04 PM 354 Views
Re: *shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 10:49:12 PM 736 Views
I think that is true of the testing not the Oaths - 08/12/2010 05:08:22 PM 662 Views
she shouldn't have, although I think they should trash the oaths in general - 07/12/2010 03:29:21 PM 678 Views
agreed! and I think Nynaeve's testing rather proved that point - 07/12/2010 03:35:38 PM 738 Views
Especially since Egwene herself didn't really think it necessary for herself to take the tests - 07/12/2010 03:43:18 PM 719 Views
well it looks like such a coalition is part of the plan - 07/12/2010 03:47:03 PM 702 Views
I meant one that would destroy the White Tower - 07/12/2010 03:53:35 PM 767 Views
ahh I see. well maybe they shall - 07/12/2010 04:00:52 PM 659 Views
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM 625 Views
She was always going to have to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 04:42:59 PM 677 Views
Good old political necessity - 07/12/2010 06:29:26 PM 586 Views
Amyrlin's decree - 07/12/2010 09:56:51 PM 671 Views
Brace yourselves, everybody... - 08/12/2010 02:56:43 PM 620 Views
Ooops, double post! *NM* - 08/12/2010 02:58:01 PM 349 Views
And what? To miss all the awesomeness she had before/during/after the test? - 07/12/2010 06:27:23 PM 653 Views
I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 07/12/2010 07:02:43 PM 808 Views
Re: I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 16/12/2010 10:40:39 AM 547 Views
And yet people keep choosing donuts over lettuce *NM* - 16/12/2010 10:47:04 AM 370 Views
It's supposed to be a required part of being Aes Sedai. - 08/12/2010 08:52:34 AM 612 Views
Has Egwene swore the Oaths? - 08/12/2010 03:11:37 PM 723 Views
Yes - she swore on the Oath Rod in TGS. *NM* - 08/12/2010 03:22:31 PM 402 Views
Love Nynaeve... - 10/12/2010 09:49:13 AM 617 Views
On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 04:53:28 AM 605 Views
Re: On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 11:53:43 AM 674 Views
Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 07:07:43 PM 532 Views
Re: Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 10:45:01 PM 697 Views
Actually I'm not being flippant - 15/12/2010 05:58:22 AM 637 Views
So? - 15/12/2010 11:40:32 AM 699 Views

Reply to Message