Active Users:1138 Time:23/11/2024 04:05:35 AM
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
The three oaths are, "To speak no word that is not true, to make no weapon for one man to kill another, and never to use the One Power as a weapon, except against Shadowspawn, to save her own life or her Warder's, or the life of another sister."

The oaths are quite literal; a gateway is not a weapon, therefore she can form one just fine. The oath does not forbid indirectly causing death with the power. Even tying a person up with the power to then kill them with steel weapons has not been forbidden by the oath.

Not to mention we've already seen how little integrity most Aes Sedai have when it comes to finding ways to weasel out of their oaths. The first one is the easiest to get around, but the second and third are nearly as weak.


Travelling yes, Deathgates no. The key phrase in the oath is "AS A WEAPON" and standard gateways are not weapons, unless specifically used as one i.e. open on e directly on top of someone to cut them in half, which an AS would not be able to do. The key however is perception, IF Elida was to convince herself that a gateway was, unto itself, a weapon she would be able unable to make the weave without fear of death, however simple refusal has the same effect. The key is that Elida is strong but brittle and her will shall be completely crushed by the Seanchean in very short order. She would be giving them Traveling and everything else within a week of capture.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 1956 Views
The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 876 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 789 Views
Wrong for two reasons - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 947 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 426 Views
Go jump in a lake - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 673 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 387 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 336 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 692 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 580 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 670 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 670 Views
Yeah I am - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 601 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 738 Views
Go dude yourself brother. - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 600 Views
wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 689 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 672 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 557 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 603 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 703 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 632 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 546 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 300 Views
go read the boooks more closely - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 972 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 771 Views
Wrong - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 598 Views
This - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 622 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 288 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 341 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 296 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 295 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 608 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 693 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 638 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 648 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 249 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 303 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 596 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 747 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 651 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 285 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 779 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 601 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 953 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 586 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 623 Views

Reply to Message