Yes, that is what you said at the end of your post.
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
1956 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
876 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
789 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
947 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
693 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
581 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
670 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
670 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
603 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
739 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
600 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
690 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
672 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
557 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
604 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
703 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
633 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
546 Views
*NM*
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
288 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
609 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
693 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
639 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
648 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
301 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
249 Views
*NM*
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
599 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
260 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
302 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
571 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
563 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
601 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
953 Views