Active Users:547 Time:05/04/2025 09:36:09 AM
Oh, love of course. malekithe Send a noteboard - 04/12/2010 07:13:10 AM
If you didn't get Rand's transformation, you're not the intended audience...

IMO, of course.


I'm supposed to believe that 'love' conquered his insanity, removed (or merged) LTT from his mind forever, got rid of the crippling sickness he had every time he seized Saidin, and also gave him 'Light' powers?

PUH LEEZ.

Are you interested in buying a bridge I have for sale?

There has been NO explanation as to why Rand believing in love cured ALL the above problems, NO EXPLANATION. Just buy this bullshit and like it.
Reply to message
Pointless characters and deaths in WoT - 04/12/2010 05:49:01 AM 2162 Views
Re: Pointless characters and deaths in WoT - 04/12/2010 06:15:12 AM 1081 Views
Other pointless characters - 04/12/2010 06:26:50 AM 1353 Views
why would you read the series and visit fan sites if you hate it all that much? *NM* - 04/12/2010 06:38:47 AM 490 Views
Re: why would you read the series and visit fan sites if you hate it all that much? - 04/12/2010 06:41:23 AM 1021 Views
If you didn't get Rand's transformation, you're not the intended audience... - 04/12/2010 06:58:20 AM 1152 Views
OFF TOPIC: Lord Haart, are you a HOMM fan? *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:06:41 AM 615 Views
Yep! Ever since (the original) King's Bounty. *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:38:20 PM 452 Views
Oh, love of course. - 04/12/2010 07:13:10 AM 1020 Views
Yeah, while you're busy not believing that, you should believe in things like the One Power too. - 04/12/2010 10:28:46 AM 963 Views
Rand's Magical Transformation - 05/12/2010 08:50:29 AM 906 Views
Re: Rand's Magical Transformation - 05/12/2010 12:06:22 PM 841 Views
Re: Oh, love of course. - 04/12/2010 01:59:13 PM 921 Views
Re: Oh, love of course. - 05/12/2010 08:51:50 AM 871 Views
You've completely missed the point - 04/12/2010 02:03:06 PM 908 Views
You've completely missed the point! - 05/12/2010 08:54:47 AM 854 Views
You're right, why would love ever be the Base of Goodness??? - 05/12/2010 08:59:27 AM 886 Views
You're proving my point actually - 05/12/2010 09:33:23 AM 797 Views
? at what point was this series not supposed to be stereotypical? - 05/12/2010 09:36:06 AM 936 Views
Well... - 05/12/2010 09:42:04 AM 1023 Views
uhm, we do? - 05/12/2010 09:48:32 AM 847 Views
Not in Rand - 05/12/2010 09:55:02 AM 814 Views
channeling isn't far from stereotypical - 05/12/2010 10:10:20 AM 1081 Views
So why do you keep reading? - 05/12/2010 10:17:49 AM 1039 Views
far from it. - 05/12/2010 10:30:02 AM 839 Views
I like the love storyline - 06/12/2010 01:38:25 AM 773 Views
I think he does it to torture me. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:48:49 AM 506 Views
Re: I think he does it to torture me. - 05/12/2010 08:55:06 AM 828 Views
Again, why are you on this board or even reading this series? - 04/12/2010 02:30:22 PM 1012 Views
Uh excuse me. - 05/12/2010 09:05:27 AM 924 Views
since you are so very unhappy, I fail to see why you continue to read the books - 05/12/2010 09:09:36 AM 764 Views
Don't twist things to suit yourself - 05/12/2010 09:38:42 AM 860 Views
I would be unhappy with that ending because the Creator has never worked directly. - 05/12/2010 09:44:17 AM 906 Views
I'd say there's been some unusualness. - 05/12/2010 09:52:22 AM 857 Views
I really like Rand post-epiphany (or BuddhaRand as I call him) - 07/12/2010 04:05:10 PM 761 Views
BuddhaRand ^_^ - 07/12/2010 04:16:26 PM 824 Views
And right down the page is "Easy life of lightside heroes" - 04/12/2010 10:43:55 AM 950 Views
Yep, can't please everyone. - 05/12/2010 01:40:19 PM 894 Views
Well, two things - 06/12/2010 05:25:27 AM 1153 Views
Re: Well, two things *NM* - 06/12/2010 09:01:25 AM 517 Views
Why are these deaths a problem? - 04/12/2010 11:34:31 PM 851 Views
Re: Pointless characters and deaths in WoT - 05/12/2010 01:56:53 PM 835 Views
Re: Pointless characters and deaths in WoT - 06/12/2010 05:11:19 AM 1070 Views
BINGO *NM* - 06/12/2010 03:59:46 PM 493 Views
It's rather simple. - 05/12/2010 02:50:10 PM 1101 Views
Don't forget Aram - 07/12/2010 07:42:06 PM 810 Views

Reply to Message