Active Users:312 Time:18/04/2025 04:39:02 AM
you'd think the Seanchan would have even lower numbers of channellers Ava Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 05:13:36 PM
since EVERY woman with the spark is collared and never has children. Whereas in the Westlands only a portion of the sparkers are caught, and only a portion of those wind up in the Tower or the Kin where they are expected to remain celibate.

The Tower dwindling had little to do with genetics, and much to do with the fact that the Tower doesn't (didn't) bother to recruit.
Reply to message
/ Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 02:24:23 PM 1220 Views
Numbers - 01/12/2010 04:09:02 PM 724 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 07:55:42 PM 1099 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 09:14:48 PM 974 Views
Thank god for that - 01/12/2010 09:35:22 PM 747 Views
Partly correct. - 02/12/2010 04:40:13 PM 809 Views
Why do we have stronger channelers now? - 02/12/2010 04:50:18 PM 654 Views
you'd think the Seanchan would have even lower numbers of channellers - 02/12/2010 05:13:36 PM 713 Views
Maybe over time - 02/12/2010 07:24:08 PM 572 Views
The consolidation only ended (relatively) recently though - 03/12/2010 02:49:22 AM 680 Views
yes and no - 04/12/2010 02:20:13 PM 676 Views
Re: yes and no - 04/12/2010 03:06:10 PM 632 Views
Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 04/12/2010 03:16:40 PM 780 Views
Re: Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 05/12/2010 04:17:40 PM 627 Views
Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 05/12/2010 04:27:45 PM 650 Views
Re: Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 06/12/2010 04:23:52 PM 569 Views
none of the others could actively channel. - 06/12/2010 04:34:31 PM 801 Views

Reply to Message