Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 03:25:28 PM
Look back at out own world pre 1800s. Yes, owing money was a BAD thing. One of the truly novel concepts in the US Constitution was the elimination of criminal penalty for debt.
Brilliant my ass
30/11/2010 07:08:46 PM
- 1395 Views
Nobles are interchangeable....
30/11/2010 07:32:50 PM
- 827 Views
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either.
30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM
- 836 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass
30/11/2010 10:31:24 PM
- 745 Views
So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
01/12/2010 11:02:18 AM
- 730 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
01/12/2010 11:05:37 AM
- 641 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
02/12/2010 03:25:28 PM
- 625 Views
I really do not see how being given new lands and a new chance is "worse than death".
02/12/2010 04:13:53 PM
- 726 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass
01/12/2010 12:57:34 AM
- 722 Views
Interesting
01/12/2010 11:04:26 AM
- 615 Views
Re: Interesting
01/12/2010 11:07:02 AM
- 619 Views
Notice how people liked Henry VIII more than they liked Henry VII
01/12/2010 11:15:03 AM
- 615 Views
because of his "Kingly" behavior, in comparison to VII's lack thereof.
01/12/2010 08:26:26 PM
- 672 Views
I think you're making my point for me
02/12/2010 06:34:17 AM
- 616 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me
02/12/2010 08:09:33 AM
- 588 Views
wasnt king henry VIII really fat, or was that another henry?*NM* *NM*
02/12/2010 04:33:50 AM
- 340 Views
He was not particularly fat until he was older.
02/12/2010 02:17:43 PM
- 659 Views