Active Users:789 Time:24/11/2024 07:32:48 AM
I thought this was what it meant. Posted about it in another thread somewhere. Bryce Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 03:12:19 PM
Am I the only one that immediately connected the dark prophecy at the end of the book with the state of the unnatural Ashaman and Aiel?

They're described as animated husks, not twisted versions of their former self (which is what 13x13 is supposed to do), the similarity to the description in the prophecy is striking.
And then, shall the Lord of the Evening come. And He shall take our eyes, for our souls shall bow before Him, and He shall take our skin, for our flesh shall serve Him, and He shall take our lips, for only Him will we praise.
Formerly Dark Prophecy, now I'm just me.

Strong proponent of a Writing Section here at RAFO.
Reply to message
The Turned Ashaman and Aiel - not 13x13 - 30/11/2010 10:20:07 PM 1594 Views
I didn't see it, but I think this could be a good catch - 30/11/2010 10:38:56 PM 849 Views
Tarna's the only one we have a handle on - 01/12/2010 01:39:28 AM 949 Views
The Aiel at the end are Aiel because they have veils (which they didn't replace before killing). - 01/12/2010 02:01:17 PM 724 Views
Liah didn't veil in Aridhol when she killed some Trollocs. - 01/12/2010 03:41:56 PM 957 Views
True, at that point she was essentially a feral animal. - 02/12/2010 01:18:14 AM 750 Views
Re: True, at that point she was essentially a feral animal. - 02/12/2010 11:08:16 AM 627 Views
Whoever she had been, she was surely no Aiel, not with that pale skin and /those dark eyes./ - 02/12/2010 12:34:46 AM 670 Views
"An Aes Sedai, perhaps. " - 02/12/2010 01:59:32 AM 591 Views
The point is it doesn't look like an Aiel - 02/12/2010 04:22:14 AM 639 Views
FIFTY quatloos on the oldcomers! - 02/12/2010 02:37:19 PM 787 Views
They did "ethnically cleanse" - 03/12/2010 07:50:24 AM 654 Views
There's no evidence to that effect; on what do you base that statement? - 06/12/2010 02:14:09 AM 776 Views
No, I was being facetious about "cleansing" - 07/12/2010 02:55:30 PM 704 Views
I thought this was what it meant. Posted about it in another thread somewhere. - 01/12/2010 03:12:19 PM 697 Views

Reply to Message