Active Users:1141 Time:22/11/2024 07:52:59 PM
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. Nate Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
The books are very enjoyable. Things are actually happening at a fast pace, instead of the ponderous, plodding pace of the previous five books. I think that Sanderson's decision to throw his hands up and say to hell with organizing the timelines properly was the best decision he could have made. Jordan was determined to keep the timelines lined up, and that caused his story to bog down. It caused the pointless waste that was Crossroads of Twilight. He appeared to feel obligated to add in dozens upon dozens of "filler" chapters to keep the timelines synched up while still switching points of view around and giving us all the characters. It was boring. It lacked storytelling verve.

This way left things a little disorienting from Perrin's story's point of view, but it was pretty easy to ignore. Yeah, so Tam was still there. Yeah, Graendal's timeline didn't really mesh with Perrin's even though they were connected. So what? I enjoyed the story of the events that happened and didn't feel the need to nitpick the way the timeline was presented. Perrin eventually matched up with Egwene and now we're golden(eyes).

If he had placed all of Perrin's chapters up to Tam's departure into Gathering Storm, he would also have needed to include Galad's chapters in Gathering Storm. That book was already big; those chapters would have made it too big, and it would have had a big focus on Perrin, where it was really Rand's book. It would have left Towers of Midnight significantly reduced in size. I'm happy with the decision that was made.

While Gathering Storm is a better book than Towers of Midnight, both are very acceptable to me, and I enjoyed them greatly. I like the humour Sanderson has brought back to the series (Elayne's hypocrisy and Nynaeve tugging on her braid and each of the ta'varen constantly wishing they were good with girls like the other two does not count as humour) -- yes, I even liked Mat's letter. I couldn't really stand Gawyn, but then I never could, so y'know. And yes, this one felt somewhat rushed, but there was a lot to do and only so many pages to do it in.

Let's face it. No disrespect to the man or his memory, because he created a series that has had a direct impact for the better on my life and I will always be grateful for that -- but with the way Jordan was writing, the incredibly slow and deliberate pace he was taking, the way he was adding extra filler chapters to pad out the story and synchronize timelines ... it would have taken him at least five more books to write the rest of this story, no matter what he said about fitting it into one. No author in the world could have done that without dropping half the plot threads in mid-stride, and an author with Jordan's increasingly ponderous precision would never have managed it unless the one volume was near on 5000 pages long.

I can't wait to get the last one, and a few years ago you would never have heard me saying that.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1393 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 764 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 760 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 684 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 630 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 695 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 730 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 631 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 740 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 597 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 771 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 635 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 636 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 822 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 684 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 672 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 673 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 308 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 594 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 645 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 562 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 314 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 611 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 688 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 625 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 604 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 583 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 739 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 582 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 704 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 601 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 569 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 314 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. - 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM 640 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. - 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM 661 Views
Um. - 01/12/2010 08:49:35 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message