Active Users:512 Time:13/10/2025 04:19:00 PM
Re: I think of it as having a finite amount of "energy" HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 03:00:07 PM
Each "item" it hits (which you can imagine as a bundling of Threads from the Pattern) uses up a portion of that energy.

Hence Rand could Balefire Natrin's Barrow strongly enough to penetrate through the lower levels to the ground beneath, and he took a huge chuck out of the pattern while doing so.


Perhaps there is a will or intent aspect to balefire (and channeling in general) that hasn't been really considered before. If you are launching balefire at a person, your intent IS the entire person. If you miss, and hit a wall, your intent isn't the structure so the wall just gets a hole in it, if you hit the person, the floor is untouched because you only want the person. There are other hints to an intent factor in channeling particularly when new channelers suddenly do something that they didn't know they could (Avi and the gateway, Rand in the Stone)

If this is so, then there would be a power consumption for not just how far back in time the thread is burned, but for how much area/threads were being effected. Hmmmm Calculus anyone
Reply to message
How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 07:20:47 AM 1026 Views
Re: How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 09:30:56 AM 794 Views
I think of it as having a finite amount of "energy" - 30/11/2010 10:56:05 AM 660 Views
Re: I think of it as having a finite amount of "energy" - 30/11/2010 03:00:07 PM 669 Views
good thinking *NM* - 30/11/2010 03:29:17 PM 265 Views
Re: How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 03:54:18 PM 669 Views
5 miles unaided. And 5 miles x the strength multiplication of the Choedan Kal as a maximum. - 30/11/2010 04:37:21 PM 955 Views
*claps* - 30/11/2010 04:53:47 PM 664 Views
Agreed, but that doesn't nullify the calculation... - 30/11/2010 05:00:09 PM 776 Views
Lol, give over Shannow - 30/11/2010 05:15:54 PM 629 Views
But you miss the point of my reply to RugbyplayingAshaman... - 30/11/2010 06:54:33 PM 672 Views
I wasn't trying to nullify the calculation - I was making the point that saidin and saidar are equal - 30/11/2010 06:16:24 PM 609 Views
It's not that saidin is stronger than saidar at all... - 30/11/2010 06:51:01 PM 716 Views
Re: It's not that saidin is stronger than saidar at all... - 30/11/2010 07:08:25 PM 619 Views
*NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:46 PM 717 Views
LMAO gg - 30/11/2010 05:13:55 PM 651 Views
they would both be dead, balefire cannot undo balfire - 30/11/2010 08:13:44 PM 666 Views
Theories - 30/11/2010 07:11:53 PM 678 Views
Re: Theories - 30/11/2010 08:54:49 PM 614 Views

Reply to Message