Active Users:445 Time:16/11/2024 03:10:32 AM
Yes, I know that. Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM
My point was that by showing us a possible future where the OP is clean but the DO is locked away, we have been told that a way exists to Seal the DO without leaving a Taint.

To my knowledge, this is the first time we've been told that such a thing is even possible.
Reply to message
Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 02:12:42 AM 1164 Views
Why does the OP usage need to disappear for rand to succeed? - 29/11/2010 02:49:36 AM 738 Views
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM 627 Views
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM 605 Views
how do cannons out-range channelers? Rand says he can channel up to 5 miles away. - 30/11/2010 08:37:34 PM 569 Views
In order for time to conitune along it's wheel-like path. - 29/11/2010 01:36:08 PM 877 Views
Oh yes, it's a huge giveaway by brandon... - 29/11/2010 05:09:19 PM 652 Views
Whichever author wrote it, fact remains that it's a pretty big reveal. - 30/11/2010 04:08:30 AM 553 Views
Of course there is - 30/11/2010 10:01:09 AM 571 Views
Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 29/11/2010 05:52:56 PM 691 Views
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM 547 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 11:26:49 PM 570 Views
Yes, I know that. - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM 671 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 05/12/2010 08:40:01 AM 666 Views

Reply to Message