Active Users:1125 Time:22/11/2024 08:08:59 PM
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
it would NO WAY be a one book ending that some ppl here keep saying he would have made the book.


That is not what "ppl" are saying. "People" are well aware that this book might have been split even with RJ behind the wheel. The thing is, though, that RJ would have split the story in a way faithful to his outline. Sanderson's sin here is that he had the arrogance to completely restructure RJ's outline, which has resulted in much poorer story.


"From" a literary mind. Also, it is quite easily inferrable from comments Sanderson has made. Frankly, after TGS he had painted himself into a corner. He made a botched-job of this.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1394 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 765 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 762 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 684 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 630 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 695 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 731 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 632 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 742 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 599 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 772 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 635 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 636 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 822 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 686 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 672 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 673 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 308 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 596 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 645 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 562 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 314 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 612 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 690 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 625 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 604 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 583 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 740 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 583 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 704 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 601 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 569 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 314 Views

Reply to Message