Active Users:462 Time:16/11/2024 03:29:49 AM
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM
It was alluded to by the visions regarding the takeover of technology (via Mat and the Cairhien research institute). Technology is more accessible than channeling and makes it redundant in many ways (for example, cannons outrange channelers).

RJ also said that if both powers were used to seal the Bore, both would be Tainted, but Rand seems to be working towards the conclusion that he needs to use both to seal the Bore. That's the "obvious" solution to him, and therefore the most likely outcome at present. If he continues with the current plan, the Taint will affect both side of the power and the only way another Breaking would be averted is to block of the power for good. This would actually solve a heap of problems, imo, because the power does very little good for anyone right now (it is primarily used a a weapon or to manipulate people). Take away the power and suddenly you remove part of the ethical dilemma of Seanchan rule, as well as the meddling and plotting of the White Tower.
Reply to message
Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 02:12:42 AM 1164 Views
Why does the OP usage need to disappear for rand to succeed? - 29/11/2010 02:49:36 AM 739 Views
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM 629 Views
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM 605 Views
how do cannons out-range channelers? Rand says he can channel up to 5 miles away. - 30/11/2010 08:37:34 PM 570 Views
In order for time to conitune along it's wheel-like path. - 29/11/2010 01:36:08 PM 878 Views
Oh yes, it's a huge giveaway by brandon... - 29/11/2010 05:09:19 PM 653 Views
Whichever author wrote it, fact remains that it's a pretty big reveal. - 30/11/2010 04:08:30 AM 555 Views
Of course there is - 30/11/2010 10:01:09 AM 572 Views
Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 29/11/2010 05:52:56 PM 692 Views
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM 547 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 11:26:49 PM 572 Views
Yes, I know that. - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM 671 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 05/12/2010 08:40:01 AM 667 Views

Reply to Message