That's exactly my point.
Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.
Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.
My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.
C xx
How about to blame yourself for a change? For a casual reader, like me, Brandon didn't horribly mixed up anything. I was perfectly able to get the story line straight the first time I read ToM with no problem.
Excluding your faulty example of Perrin, what else exactly was horribly messed up?
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1395 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
766 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
731 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
632 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
599 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
773 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
765 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
823 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
686 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
672 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
571 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
675 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
596 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
314 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
780 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
690 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
627 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
604 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
583 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM
741 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
910 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
563 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
632 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
680 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
670 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
670 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
389 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
640 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
588 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
662 Views