Active Users:554 Time:05/04/2025 12:35:23 PM
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM

I also read TGS and TOM one after the other and would have to disagree wth your comment there too. the timeline jumping around was very noticeable and not sensible or smooth at all - after hearing of Perrin being in Caemlyn with the Queen we suddenly go to him being mired in the middle of nowhere.


Where exactly we seen this? I don't remember hearing of Perrin being in Caemlyn with the Queen and see him mired in the middly of nowhere.

You made this up.



Nope, just remembered it not quite right :) I was thinking of Rand and Tam's scene towards the end of TGS where Tam mentions the Whitecloaks and the queen. Then the reference to Elayne threw my memory off, I thought he'd said they were all in Caemlyn together at that point which he didn't.

He's most certainly mired in the middle of nowhere in TOM, how else would you describe wading through mud for days?

C xx


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1468 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 330 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 831 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 834 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 756 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 700 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 763 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 806 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 703 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 811 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 672 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 844 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 699 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 831 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 703 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 891 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 757 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 741 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 751 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 333 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 672 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 729 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 636 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 346 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 859 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 686 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 754 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 699 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 679 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 655 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 807 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 659 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 785 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 666 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 645 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 347 Views

Reply to Message