Active Users:1142 Time:22/11/2024 07:54:50 PM
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))

How could you say this? You reach the end then jump back in chapter 2 to go over the same timeline.

Once the latest Cooper timeline comes out I'm going to read the chapters in a chronological order (or as close to as can be gotten). I expect it highlight even more how stuffing Perrin and Mat's setbacks and Avi's visions after Veins of Gold takes away from the sense of despair (A Memory of Light) RJ was trying to show before Rand's epiphany.

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

'Team Light' would have looked fraked. A Rand victory almost as bad as defeat, the other two ta'veren tied down, Egwene no longer able to influence the Tower Aes Sedai, with the Seanchan plan to attack revealed (but not yet launched) and Avi's vision to ram it all home.

TOM would have the showed 'Team Light' (except the Seanchan) getting their act together, with all plot lines pulling out of despair / setbacks at once (except how the Seanchan will eventually be dealt with).


I agree 100% with this. There are massive problems to the timeline as it is now. Sanderson has left little to no "anchor" events which allow us to puzzle out when things are happening in relation to each other. I suspect this is because he doesn't know himself. Sanderson has claimed RJ's chronology is "extremely complex". Apparently it is too complex for him to get right, while fans like Steven Cooper have been able to make a timeline of the books prior to KoD with a little effort. After that, of course, the timeline went out the window.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1393 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 764 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 760 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 684 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 630 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 695 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 730 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 632 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 740 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 597 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 771 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 635 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 636 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 822 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 684 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 672 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 673 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 308 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 594 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 645 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 562 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 314 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 611 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 688 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 625 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 604 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 583 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 739 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 582 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 704 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 601 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 569 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 314 Views

Reply to Message