Reason for the reader to find Rand's impulsive "foolproof" plan a bit unlikely to kill off Graendal at that point of the story? Absolutely.
"She couldn't have died because God's purpose for her was not done" is psychotic reasoning in the real world. As textual analysis of an ambiguous murder in a book, not so much.
"She couldn't have died because God's purpose for her was not done" is psychotic reasoning in the real world. As textual analysis of an ambiguous murder in a book, not so much.
Provisional calendar for Towers of Midnight: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0ApFWTyzG9G_UdHZCUjQzVGNLeUJyMkUycXkzQlExSFE&output=html
I was right! In your face. 
- 24/11/2010 06:57:21 AM
1115 Views
- 24/11/2010 06:57:21 AM
1115 Views
No, you guys were really wrong.
- 24/11/2010 08:52:15 PM
577 Views
That kind of thing always annoys me.
- 25/11/2010 02:52:03 PM
478 Views
I didn't mind she lived. I only minded that she was worthless afterward and nothing came of it *NM*
- 25/11/2010 03:42:40 PM
213 Views
What he gets for posting ToM threads when he's only read a few chapters, I reckon. 
- 25/11/2010 05:11:17 PM
479 Views
- 25/11/2010 05:11:17 PM
479 Views
I'm still scratching my head over this. (I've finished the book)
- 29/11/2010 05:44:20 AM
473 Views
Don't blame you (and, thanks, now I don't have to sweat spoilers--and neither do you).
- 29/11/2010 01:49:21 PM
577 Views
No reason for Rand to think so
- 27/11/2010 01:14:29 AM
463 Views