Active Users:1167 Time:23/11/2024 02:59:43 AM
Re: That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 26/11/2010 09:40:54 PM


Listen, we know that Rj intended to write the 5 main plot archs in parallel, and that BS took two of them, created an artificial and poorly thought out break-off point and made a novel out of it. This resulted, as DomA rightly points out, in a novel structure that is a complete departure from what RJ intended. The result is that ToM is a structural mess. RJ's vision was not honoured, and frankly, I think, ruined by this.



That's what I call "bullsh!t". Nothing is ruined. Stop it please.
Reply to message
What was the purpose of Graendal?! - 25/11/2010 03:54:29 PM 1570 Views
BS wanted to put her behind a "complicated" plot - 25/11/2010 04:11:01 PM 836 Views
Yes, it's BSand's fault. RJ couldn't have EVER planned it all out himself right? Yes mm hmm - 25/11/2010 04:19:02 PM 773 Views
read DomA's review. BullShit ruined the series. *NM* - 25/11/2010 04:31:56 PM 386 Views
Links or it didn't happen. - 25/11/2010 04:53:24 PM 718 Views
oh but, bookwyrm, now they have such a nice easy scapegoat!! *NM* - 26/11/2010 01:35:53 AM 328 Views
And DomA is such infallible authority on the all things WoT why? *NM* - 25/11/2010 06:00:42 PM 360 Views
I'd say that DomA is one of the most thoughtful posters here. He researches his comments and gives - 25/11/2010 06:47:58 PM 751 Views
You got me wrong - 25/11/2010 07:11:43 PM 868 Views
That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 01:33:08 AM 660 Views
Re: That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 03:47:38 PM 687 Views
Re: That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 09:40:54 PM 592 Views
Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 01:54:19 AM 591 Views
Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 02:58:55 AM 753 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 07:56:38 PM 730 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 11:52:53 PM 584 Views
Sorry, Dominic, but I strongly disagree. - 28/11/2010 05:30:28 AM 601 Views
Re: Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 06:02:22 PM 556 Views
clearly the timeline is wonky, but it's easy enough to keep track of - 04/12/2010 05:32:34 PM 759 Views
A minor aside - 26/11/2010 02:49:03 PM 576 Views
oops minor omission, i meant the last 3 books were meant to be one big tome *NM* - 26/11/2010 04:40:53 PM 307 Views
Meh, even that is pretty ridiculous - 26/11/2010 06:32:20 PM 544 Views
Well - 26/11/2010 03:01:46 PM 596 Views
Lots - 25/11/2010 04:38:52 PM 806 Views
Re: Lots - 25/11/2010 04:53:38 PM 657 Views
What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:01:15 PM 800 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:07:30 PM 677 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:11:15 PM 710 Views
I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 05:58:19 PM 781 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:22:31 PM 707 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:34:57 PM 655 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:43:38 PM 655 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:47:10 PM 651 Views
I imagine it is both. - 25/11/2010 11:37:21 PM 672 Views
No, it wasn't obvious. - 26/11/2010 03:25:09 AM 581 Views
Well, it was after I read it. - 26/11/2010 02:03:20 PM 636 Views
Yes, she was useless to this storyline. - 25/11/2010 11:40:57 PM 716 Views
If it hadn't been Graendal, it WOULD have been rather contrived... - 26/11/2010 01:35:12 AM 556 Views
Well, we were under the impression that Moridin alone had access to the True Power. - 26/11/2010 02:36:31 AM 774 Views
I was under the impression other Forsaken had access as well, something pointed out by their POVs .. - 27/11/2010 09:09:17 AM 576 Views
No, only Moridin - 27/11/2010 06:43:17 PM 554 Views
Please. - 26/11/2010 03:16:36 AM 677 Views
Hmm? - 26/11/2010 06:56:01 AM 603 Views
NM *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:40 AM 357 Views

Reply to Message