Active Users:398 Time:19/12/2024 10:13:27 PM
Re: An a'dam is a link that the damane cannot escape HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 11/11/2010 02:20:30 PM
The flows are controlled by the sul'dam, even if (highly unusually) all the Power comes from the damane. But the Aes Sedai damane is prevented from forming any flow that violates the Oaths, so she is useless in battle unless a way around the Oaths can be found.

I'm pretty certain Jordan has commented on the same being true of any ordinary (i.e. voluntary) circle. The leader (Aes Sedai, Wise One, Windfinder, Ashaman, whatever) cannot draw power for a weave that violates an Oath.


In the damane example, the flows are controlled by the sul'dam, but it's still the damane making them.

In the circle, once you've given up your power, you've lost control to do anything. I don't see how the oaths can do what isn't naturally possible--by preventing someone from forming the weaves when you're linked with them and pass along the power.

The 3 oaths cannot make the user do something impossible. It can only prevent in physical ways. Choking them so they can't speak the lie. Not letting them form the weaves of something forbidden. But, to actually stop someone leading a circle? That, as far as we're aware, is impossible. Once you've given over power--its theirs to do as they wish, for as long as they wish.


Since the Oaths can choke someone trying to tell a lie, could they burn the channeler out to prevent a OP violation?
Reply to message
Aes Sedai and the 3 Oaths combined with linking - 10/11/2010 08:18:36 PM 1046 Views
Very interesting question. - 10/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 563 Views
An a'dam is a link that the damane cannot escape - 11/11/2010 03:20:03 AM 494 Views
Re: An a'dam is a link that the damane cannot escape - 11/11/2010 02:15:17 PM 494 Views
Re: An a'dam is a link that the damane cannot escape - 11/11/2010 02:20:30 PM 489 Views
Re: An a'dam is a link that the damane cannot escape - 11/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 500 Views
This was asked before - 12/11/2010 12:24:26 AM 562 Views

Reply to Message