It would indeed have been nice to know if the reasoning behind people's Graendal theories was right, or if she did it in a different manner.
I guess it doesn't, but there is the same evidence against Slayer as there was before. Basically that we knew very little about what he could do before book 10, and it was supposted to be obvious in book 5 who did it. As far as we knew at that point, slayer had no way of getting rid of the body or any of several other problems. Also, in book 10, when we get Slayer's POV, he thinks with pride about killing the two BA in tear back in book 4. But doesn't think about the Forsaken he killed?(under this theory). Really, there is no reason to go there. Just accept that Graendal did it personally. It makes sense that she was there. She had means, motive, and opportunity.
Also, from ToM, Graendal doesn't seem to have worked with Slayer much in the past, but i don't think that is explicitly stated.
where Graendal tells Slayer that she wouldn't trust him to kill another Chosen. That rules out Slayer's acting as her agent.
Asmodean *SPOILER*
- 02/11/2010 07:12:29 PM
1396 Views
Graendal was responsible for 3 forsaken deaths...
- 02/11/2010 07:30:30 PM
1301 Views
So there was nothing specifically..
- 02/11/2010 07:36:16 PM
947 Views
There is a story beind the killing...
- 02/11/2010 07:38:37 PM
861 Views
yeah but
- 02/11/2010 07:42:25 PM
867 Views
well originally RJ never intended to mention it in the books at all
- 03/11/2010 04:06:18 PM
771 Views
I haven't read ToM yet, so please don't spoiler too much for me, but...
- 02/11/2010 08:48:47 PM
833 Views
Re: I haven't read ToM yet, so please don't spoiler too much for me, but...
- 04/11/2010 02:18:37 PM
705 Views
I'm wrong. Apparently there is a scene
- 04/11/2010 07:01:41 PM
776 Views