Active Users:1197 Time:23/11/2024 03:42:57 AM
Re: What should historical effects mean? That blip is actually sort of comforting. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 03:03:11 AM
So the death of a loved one that has already happened should not make you feel sad, but the fact of the eventual death of another loved one should?

What devastates people more? Knowing exactly how their ancestors died or knowing how their immediate and future descendents are going to die? Would the fact that there was a genocide fifty years ago trouble your thought more than the knowledge that there could be one in the future?
Well how long is that salvation supposed to last them? What do you want - a guarantee of eternal prosperity? Their grandkids were still rulers and authority figures. Projecting associations and inherited benefits further down the years is kind of ridiculous, especially since it seems likely that Rand & Aviendha hardly knew their children, let alone their grandchildren and beyond. These people are strangers to Rand & Aviendha, not loved ones, with less claim on their affections than the late unlamented Janduin & Shaiel (I thought naming one of their sons after that asshole was a bit much too).

This isn't about prosperity or success. It isn't about them being kings or not. Some of those descendents showed clearly that they misused their association with the Dragon Reborn. This is the complete eradication of a people.

The viewings of the Aiel of the past were bearable because even though it was sad that so many of them died and the changing world forced them to give up their beliefs and principles in the race for survival, in the end, its fine because they adapted to changes and continued on strong, if in no way similar to their life before. What we see in the future is a proud people brought to their knees, and then kicked down even further till they aren't there at all. Whatever one thinks of the Aiel, it is true that they are a proud people who have managed to build a fairly stable and honest society in the worst of conditions. I fail to see how it is not sad that they did not adapt to the changing times again, and instead were reduced to begging for food, forgetting all they were, and in the end, eradicated.

How so?

Simple. It is an entirely normal instinct to want your progeny to survive and drive. It goes even beyond emotion, being hard-wired into our brains and is the very basis of evolution. Why else do you think so many people are so passionate about global warming? Why do you think people care about preserving the world for the future generations?

So, when you read a character's PoV, and place yourself in their position, seeing all their progeny utterly destroyed is sad. The wonder is you think this is something weird. It seems entirely natural to me.

Why? That seems like the most absurd sort of vanity. "All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." At some point you have to kick the kids out of the nest. The umpteenth great-grandchildren are well beyond any genuine connection or emotional investment. Anyway, Rand's impression is the actual presence of that same world.

Absurd vanity it may be, but it is also instinct. Most people will tell you that they would like for all their descendents to be happy, and they won't even think long about it. Look at the constitutions of great nations and you'll always see talk of a stable, long lasting society, with generations of our children living in peace and harmony and justice and so on. Like I said, it is only natural.

As for the future world existing because of Rand... that's the point. He ended up fighting and sacrificing for a world where his descendents are eradicated.

And you find the idea of a dozen generations later still operating under the same situation enforced upon them by their ancestor to be better? You would feel better about a world where Rand's line is locked into enternal prosperity because at the end of a moment of world-wide upheaval, he ended up on top of the heap?

Don't be silly. No one is mourning that all of Rand's descendents aren't top dogs wearing silk coats and living in bid palaces. The issue is that not one of them survives. And while that is, eventually, likely true of many people, it isn't a fact that anyone knows like Aviendha does. That is what causes all the emotion.

The difference in our perspectives on this issue, I think is derived from basic values on the one hand. I am not sure how you stand, but I am an individualist over collectivist in my values. I believe that an individual bears sole and total responsibility for his actions, and for no more than his actions. Rand's issues and success or failure in the world is a moot point beyond his death. The situation after that is for other people to deal with. Events and choices made after his death have nothing to do with him. The failure and destruction of his descendents reflects no failure or loss on his part. These are not parts of Rand that are dying, they are discrete individuals.

But that is a very mechanical thought process. I'm not saying that I disagree, or that I blame Rand or Aviendha for the failure of their progeny. But why on earth would you think this is about responsibility or blame anyway? This is about empathy. I feel sad when I see poor woman on the street, begging for money to feed her malnourished child. And she isn't even my responsibility. The best I can do for her is try to vote for a government that isn't incompetent and corrupt. But that doesn't stop me from being sad.

Now, seeing that happen to my descendents will make me at least equally sad. And that is the kind of sorrow and horror Aviendha feels. As a reader who is invested in her PoV, that makes me sad too, though the degree is obviously lesser, this being fiction.

And on the other hand, it has to do with my already established position vis a vis the Aiel culture and life. I have, I think, made it clear that I felt their outlook and habits were a cultural dead end. Why should I ever be surprised or tremendously affected by something that is more or less what I have seen coming for a long time now? It's like watching a criminal hang. However likable he might be, that entirely foreseeable outcome of his lifestyle can only be so sad, because you're inured to it to a certain degree, having been prepared for a long time. It is not that I hate the Aiel and revel in their demise, while those of you who like them are hurt by their fate. Rather, I am the doctor who has diagnosed their terminal illness and those of you who scoffed at me or took it with a grain of salt or wrote it off as my crazy rantings, are shocked to see them die. To you, it came out of the blue, while I have long accepted the probability of an outcome like this. You see them crushed and destroyed and go "WHAT?!?!" and my reaction is "Duh."

Likely outcomes elicit less emotion? That's absurd. I watched my cousin die of cancer. I knew he was going to die, I could write a 50 page thesis on the molecular and cellular mechanisms that caused his death, I was intimately aware of what was coming. I can assure you, at no point did I react with "duh". While this is fiction and one obviously feels far less, the principles are the same. That the Aiel, if they fail to adapt to the changing world, will be eradicated is not surprising. Doesn't stop it from being sad.

Back when this was a common quick poll topic, do you remember the guy who most often made the case that the Seanchan could and would kick Aiel ass? I say this not to gloat or say "I told you so" - just to show you how I might be naturally inclined to accept the decline and defeat of the Aiel, particularly at Seanchan hands (and acceptance is supposedly the final stage in the grieving process - I took the news at stage five, while the rest of you might still be working through it).

Bah. You claimed that the Aiel would loose as they are to the Seanchan as they are. Given how long and how successfully the Aiel fight them in the future, your arguments look even more silly now.
Reply to message
What's with all the Aviendha-related angst? - 03/11/2010 11:52:28 PM 1598 Views
Are you emotionally impacted by anything in WoT? Not taking a jab, just asking. - 03/11/2010 11:57:09 PM 603 Views
I laughed out loud at Mat's letter. - 04/11/2010 12:22:51 AM 808 Views
And that isn't sad? - 04/11/2010 12:40:22 AM 637 Views
What should historical effects mean? That blip is actually sort of comforting. - 04/11/2010 01:31:23 AM 551 Views
Re: What should historical effects mean? That blip is actually sort of comforting. - 04/11/2010 03:03:11 AM 535 Views
Re: What's with all the Aviendha-related angst? - 05/11/2010 01:47:38 PM 552 Views
Re: What's with all the Aviendha-related angst? - 06/11/2010 06:48:37 PM 529 Views

Reply to Message