Active Users:1133 Time:23/11/2024 02:28:55 AM
Which were their ages before they swore. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM
Seriously though we know that's not the case as Siuan and Leanne both reverted back to "prime child bearing year" when they were Stilled


Would it be the same for someone like Verin, or hell, Cadsuane?
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 997 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 552 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 718 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 216 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 634 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 688 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 746 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 511 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 468 Views
The answer is very simple. The WT discourages AS from having families as it distracts for being AS - 03/10/2010 01:08:30 AM 495 Views
OTOH, maybe they're all just post-menopausal *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:53:34 AM 239 Views
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM 444 Views
Which were their ages before they swore. - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM 473 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 480 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 507 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 494 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 554 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 213 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 207 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 221 Views

Reply to Message