Why would they have made different binders for men and women in the AoL?
For the same reason they made different angreal for men and women.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL?
01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM
- 897 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work
01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM
- 620 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it.
01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
- 503 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM
- 514 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM
- 511 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM
- 479 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker.
01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM
- 602 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different
01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM
- 480 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while.
01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM
- 462 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN?
01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
- 563 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM*
02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 197 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men?
02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
- 483 Views
yes
04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM
- 539 Views
Re: yes
04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM
- 483 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM
- 490 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM
- 473 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM*
03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM
- 256 Views
Doubtful
07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM
- 492 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM*
07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM
- 247 Views