Active Users:1037 Time:14/11/2024 06:44:25 AM
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM
An oath not to make weapons requires the person to know what a weapon is, and to think of whatever they're making as a weapon (or not). A crazy person who doesn't remember which weaves are weapons and which aren't, or who doesn't think of their weave as a weapon, would not be restricted by the oath, just like Aes Sedai can still tell a lie as long as in their minds they think it's true.

tl;dr, an oath on the rod requires a certain degree of cognizance to make it work, since the person's perceptions of their oath and their actions are what binds them.


No need to comprehend much with that oath
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 889 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 614 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 508 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 220 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 462 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 597 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 474 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 455 Views
At least they can feel the True Source - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 483 Views
All true. - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 549 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 557 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 191 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 198 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 230 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 195 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 471 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 560 Views
yes - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 533 Views
Re: yes - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 477 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 483 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 467 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 254 Views
Doubtful - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 484 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 245 Views
Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 471 Views
Re: Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 499 Views

Reply to Message