Active Users:454 Time:18/04/2025 07:23:12 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 949 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 682 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 558 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 568 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 570 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 530 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 245 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 525 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 668 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 544 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 518 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 551 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 611 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 619 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 217 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 224 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 258 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 222 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 540 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 630 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 602 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 538 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 546 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 542 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 282 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 544 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 267 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 539 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 562 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes