Active Users:1207 Time:23/11/2024 06:26:40 AM
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
An oath not to make weapons requires the person to know what a weapon is, and to think of whatever they're making as a weapon (or not). A crazy person who doesn't remember which weaves are weapons and which aren't, or who doesn't think of their weave as a weapon, would not be restricted by the oath, just like Aes Sedai can still tell a lie as long as in their minds they think it's true.

tl;dr, an oath on the rod requires a certain degree of cognizance to make it work, since the person's perceptions of their oath and their actions are what binds them.

Good point though.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 896 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 619 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 502 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 513 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 222 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 467 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 601 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 479 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 461 Views
At least they can feel the True Source - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 488 Views
All true. - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 553 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 562 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 193 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 200 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 232 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 197 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 483 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 565 Views
yes - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 539 Views
Re: yes - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 481 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 489 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 473 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 256 Views
Doubtful - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 491 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 247 Views
Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 476 Views
Re: Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 503 Views

Reply to Message