Active Users:602 Time:15/11/2024 01:00:54 PM
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? malekithe Send a noteboard - 30/09/2010 10:13:25 PM
As far as we know the oath rod is infallible. Is it though? Perhaps an oath limits ones methods are more reliable than one that completely voids the possibility. The oath against lying does not stop one from being deceptive. The oath against using the one power as a weapon and even the one against the creation of weapons both have exceptions. I would believe there was a reason for this. In fact, the only oaths we have that leave no choices to the bound person are Galina's oath of obedience and she is devoid of any will to fight against it.


What is the loophole in the oath against creating weapons? Do you mean "for one man to kill another"? And thus they can make it for one man to kill a woman, one woman to kill a man, or one woman to kill women etc etc etc?

I think the Dark oath loophole is a plot contrivance for Verin's scene because we never knew what the dark oaths were before that moment.

However Aes Sedai being Aes Sedai it stands to reason that whoever instituted the oaths should have realized they could wiggle out of it in a hundred different methods and used something like the oaths of obedience that the Sitters used on the BA and Therava used on Galina
Reply to message
Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 29/09/2010 08:35:55 AM 1211 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 29/09/2010 11:52:10 AM 764 Views
That makes no sense. - 29/09/2010 02:28:33 PM 698 Views
Squeeze an item too hard, and it will find a way to escape. - 29/09/2010 05:54:50 PM 691 Views
It's poetic. *NM* - 29/09/2010 11:59:05 AM 284 Views
The Forsaken that created the Oaths in the first place must have messed up - 29/09/2010 03:14:30 PM 705 Views
Most likely - 29/09/2010 05:43:38 PM 787 Views
Although given how we know Oaths work, they wouldn't have to die. - 29/09/2010 09:55:22 PM 603 Views
Good point. I didn't look at it that way. *NM* - 30/09/2010 01:39:33 AM 341 Views
It's really, really stupid - 29/09/2010 09:58:51 PM 632 Views
As with many previous similar debates regarding the Shadow - 29/09/2010 10:18:03 PM 611 Views
Jordan needed it this way to be able to write the deeply moving Verin confession scene - 29/09/2010 10:39:22 PM 649 Views
LOL *NM* - 30/09/2010 04:16:35 PM 257 Views
it's not so much that they are dumb... they just have no common sense! - 30/09/2010 05:57:03 PM 649 Views
It's less stupid than you think - 29/09/2010 11:51:34 PM 666 Views
With the Black Ajah, you either agree to join, or you're murdered - 01/10/2010 10:16:41 PM 560 Views
Translation error - 30/09/2010 01:02:06 AM 721 Views
This would be awesome if true. Unfortunately, I don't think it is - 01/10/2010 10:20:20 PM 547 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 04:20:05 PM 664 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 10:13:25 PM 618 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 10:38:11 PM 630 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 11:52:40 PM 612 Views
Because no one is perfect. - 01/10/2010 03:06:14 AM 522 Views
Padan Fain wasn't a mistake. - 01/10/2010 03:56:28 AM 583 Views
Sure he was. - 01/10/2010 05:22:09 AM 575 Views
Re: Sure he was. - 01/10/2010 06:39:26 AM 569 Views
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. - 01/10/2010 07:13:03 AM 569 Views
I always hate that saying..ignorance is bliss! So it should be a valid excuse! - 01/10/2010 07:36:52 AM 576 Views
Happiness is also not an excuse. - 01/10/2010 09:32:18 AM 533 Views
That's not a mistake, that's bad luck (Yay for the Pattern ) - 01/10/2010 03:48:32 PM 610 Views
It was a calculated risk, but the wrong bet. - 01/10/2010 03:57:32 PM 552 Views

Reply to Message