I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
Tamyrlin Send a noteboard - 26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM
Dom, question - do we know for certain that Brandon picks the order of the chapters? I'd be surprised if Harriet left that to Brandon to determine, but maybe there is some interview quote out there that says Brandon chooses it?
And I thought this quote was applicable to this discussion, something from TL that you wrote earlier in 2009 before TGS was released. http://www.theoryland.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1602&page=2
It's really quite possible that in TGS Rand and Egwene's story lines mirror one another as Perrin's and Rand's did in TSR. That would explain why Brandon decided to stack them together instead of Perrin + Rand, Egwene + Mat, for example. From another report, I understood that Brandon said TGS has the build up to TG from two story lines (Egwene + Rand, it seems), and 'teasers' for clusters 3-4, while book 13 will have the core events on the same timeline for Mat and Perrin, and the second part of the books will bring together everything. So basically, we could say we have the first 2/3 of Rand and Egwene in TGS with 1/3 or Mat and Perrin, and in book 13 there will be the last 2/3 of Mat/Perrin and the last third of Rand/Egwene. Linda and myself expect that cluster #5, in which Brandon put Elayne, Taim, the Bordermen etc. will be mostly absent from TGS.
The only worry I have is that it sounds fairly similar to what RJ attempted with WH/COT/KOD. It worked for me, and I don't mind that much to have to wait one more year before really getting into Mat/Perrin. I probably have to brace myself even more for the fact the book will be highly criticized. It's what I dislike about CoT - the fact more time is spent defending/attacking it than discussing it.
I'm with you about this particular format of the books; tackling story lines like this invites a high level of criticism as it pertains to chronology and potential chronological mistakes. But I'm hoping we spend more time discussing the content of these books rather than defending/attacking them. I do understand that your criticism has more to do with the way that Team Jordan decided to organize chapters in TGS and possibly ToM. But, there is nothing we can do about it, like arguing about Sweet covers at this point, don't you think?
And I thought this quote was applicable to this discussion, something from TL that you wrote earlier in 2009 before TGS was released. http://www.theoryland.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1602&page=2
It's really quite possible that in TGS Rand and Egwene's story lines mirror one another as Perrin's and Rand's did in TSR. That would explain why Brandon decided to stack them together instead of Perrin + Rand, Egwene + Mat, for example. From another report, I understood that Brandon said TGS has the build up to TG from two story lines (Egwene + Rand, it seems), and 'teasers' for clusters 3-4, while book 13 will have the core events on the same timeline for Mat and Perrin, and the second part of the books will bring together everything. So basically, we could say we have the first 2/3 of Rand and Egwene in TGS with 1/3 or Mat and Perrin, and in book 13 there will be the last 2/3 of Mat/Perrin and the last third of Rand/Egwene. Linda and myself expect that cluster #5, in which Brandon put Elayne, Taim, the Bordermen etc. will be mostly absent from TGS.
The only worry I have is that it sounds fairly similar to what RJ attempted with WH/COT/KOD. It worked for me, and I don't mind that much to have to wait one more year before really getting into Mat/Perrin. I probably have to brace myself even more for the fact the book will be highly criticized. It's what I dislike about CoT - the fact more time is spent defending/attacking it than discussing it.
I'm with you about this particular format of the books; tackling story lines like this invites a high level of criticism as it pertains to chronology and potential chronological mistakes. But I'm hoping we spend more time discussing the content of these books rather than defending/attacking them. I do understand that your criticism has more to do with the way that Team Jordan decided to organize chapters in TGS and possibly ToM. But, there is nothing we can do about it, like arguing about Sweet covers at this point, don't you think?
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed)
25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM
- 3412 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right
25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM
- 1238 Views
Everyone seems to think Rand will talk to Egwene, but a male channeler also makes sense
25/09/2010 10:44:18 PM
- 983 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
25/09/2010 08:10:54 AM
- 1154 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
25/09/2010 08:11:37 AM
- 878 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves...
25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM
- 1061 Views
this "we like it because it's family" stuff is worrisome
25/09/2010 10:18:22 AM
- 1031 Views
After his COT review, a less then gushing review isn't great
25/09/2010 11:42:39 AM
- 976 Views
But he is specifically trying to avoid being overly fanboyish BECAUSE of that CoT review. *NM*
27/09/2010 04:19:21 PM
- 495 Views
Damn, his COT review was infinitely more enthusiastic. What could it all mean? *NM*
25/09/2010 01:06:00 PM
- 511 Views
But his CoT review was also more enthusiastic than his KoD and TGS reviews *NM*
25/09/2010 01:07:15 PM
- 516 Views
Hmm, interesting point. Could a guilty conscience be setting in? *NM*
25/09/2010 01:26:30 PM
- 472 Views
I'm guessing Olver will sacrifice his Snakes and Foxes game his father made for him *NM*
25/09/2010 06:09:10 PM
- 649 Views
I haven't read the review but...
25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM
- 1493 Views
That's not what I meant...
25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM
- 1090 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review.
25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM
- 923 Views
It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM
- 1031 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM
- 915 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM
- 1161 Views
I blame JordanCon too.
26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM
- 1053 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam,
26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM
- 970 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines...
25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM
- 1059 Views
To me it's two different things
26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM
- 1148 Views
I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM
- 981 Views
Re: I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
26/09/2010 08:31:00 PM
- 1070 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed'
26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM
- 952 Views
The review is back up...
27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM
- 931 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM
27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM
- 929 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM*
27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM
- 423 Views
It was...
27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM
- 782 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM*
27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM
- 432 Views
What do you mean?
27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM
- 840 Views
I read somewhere that they'd release two different chapters this time. Could well be wrong though. *NM*
28/09/2010 02:15:28 AM
- 450 Views
Olver
27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM
- 1079 Views
doubt he'll die. Jason's review is too much of a spoiler if he actually dies *NM*
27/09/2010 11:46:16 AM
- 474 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues
27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM
- 863 Views
Not true...
28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM
- 851 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same.
28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM
- 927 Views
Not true indeed... and....
28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM
- 1087 Views